The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Secondary metabolites influence Arabidopsis/Botrytis interactions: variation in host production and pathogen sensitivity
Abstract
Summary: Numerous studies have suggested that plant/pathogen interactions are partially mediated via plant secondary metabolite production and corresponding pathogen tolerance. However, there are inconsistent reports on the ability of particular compounds to provide resistance to a pathogen. Most of these studies have focused on individual isolates of a given pathogen, suggesting that pathogens vary in their sensitivity to plant‐produced toxins. We tested variability in virulence among pathogen isolates, and the impact on this by plant production of, and pathogen tolerance to, secondary metabolites. Botrytis cinerea isolates showed differing sensitivity to purified camalexin, and camalexin‐sensitive isolates produced larger lesions on camalexin‐deficient Arabidopsis genotypes than on the wild type. In contrast, the camalexin‐insensitive isolate produced lesions of similar size on wild‐type and camalexin‐deficient Arabidopsis. Additional analysis with Arabidopsis secondary metabolite biosynthetic mutants suggests that Botrytis also has variable sensitivity to phenylpropanoids and glucosinolates. Furthermore, Botrytis infection generates a gradient of secondary metabolite responses emanating from the developing lesion, with the Botrytis isolate used determining the accumulation pattern. Collectively, our results indicate that Arabidopsis/Botrytis interactions are influenced at the metabolic level by variations in toxin production in the host and sensitivity in the pathogen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hemm, M. R., Ruegger, M. O., & Chapple, C. (2003) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.006544 · Cited by 198
Cited by
Explaining intraspecific diversity in plant secondary metabolites in an ecological context
Moore, B. D., Andrew, R. L., Külheim, C., & Foley, W. J. (2014) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12526 · Cited by 533
Induced plant secondary metabolites for phytopatogenic fungi control: a review
Ribera, A. E., & Zuñiga, G. (2012) · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition · doi:10.4067/s0718-95162012005000040 · Cited by 87
(2024) · doi:10.1093/plphys/kiae274 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Kliebenstein, D. J., Rowe, H. C., & Denby, K. J.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-36
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W1926061679
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Secondary metabolites influence Arabidopsis/Botrytis interactions: variation in host production and pathogen sensitivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02508.x
- The paper
- Kliebenstein, D. J., Rowe, H. C., & Denby, K. J. (2005). Secondary metabolites influence Arabidopsis/Botrytis interactions: variation in host production and pathogen sensitivity. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02508.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.