Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 481

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification and characterization of Arabidopsis gibberellin receptors

Open access
Nakajima, Masatoshi, Shimada, Asako, Takashi, Yoshiyuki, Kim, Young‐Cheon, Park, Seung‐Hyun, Ueguchi‐Tanaka, Miyako, Suzuki, Hiroyuki, Katoh, Etsuko, Iuchi, Satoshi, Kobayashi, Masatomo, Maeda, Tatsuya, Matsuoka, Makoto, Yamaguchi, Isomaro·2006·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Three gibberellin (GA) receptor genes ( AtGID1a , AtGID1b and AtGID1c ), each an ortholog of the rice GA receptor gene ( OsGID1 ), were cloned from Arabidopsis, and the characteristics of their recombinant proteins were examined. The GA‐binding activities of the three recombinant proteins were confirmed by an in vitro assay. Biochemical analyses revealed similar ligand selectivity among the recombinants, and all recombinants showed higher affinity to GA 4 than to other GAs. AtGID1b was unique in its binding affinity to GA 4 and in its pH dependence when compared with the other two, by only showing binding in a narrow pH range (pH 6.4–7.5) with 10‐fold higher affinity (apparent K d for GA 4 = 3 × 10 −8 m ) than AtGID1a and AtGID1c. A two‐hybrid yeast system only showed in vivo interaction in the presence of GA 4 between each AtGID1 and the Arabidopsis DELLA proteins (AtDELLAs), negative regulators of GA signaling. For this interaction with AtDELLAs, AtGID1b required only one‐tenth of the amount of GA 4 that was necessary for interaction between the other AtGID1s and AtDELLAs, reflecting its lower K d value. AtDELLA boosted the GA‐binding activity of AtGID1 in vitro , which suggests the formation of a complex between AtDELLA and AtGID1–GA that binds AtGID1 to GA more tightly. The expression of each AtGID1 clone in the rice gid1‐1 mutant rescued the GA‐insensitive dwarf phenotype. These results demonstrate that all three AtGID1s functioned as GA receptors in Arabidopsis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02748.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 481

Metadata

Authors
Nakajima, M., Shimada, A., Takashi, Y., Kim, Y., Park, S., Ueguchi‐Tanaka, M., Suzuki, H., Katoh, E., Iuchi, S., Kobayashi, M., Maeda, T., Matsuoka, M., & Yamaguchi, I.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-05-08
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
880-889
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2150200419
Cited by
481
References
1
FWCI
45.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification and characterization of Arabidopsis gibberellin receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02748.x
The paper
Nakajima, M., Shimada, A., Takashi, Y., Kim, Y., Park, S., Ueguchi‐Tanaka, M., Suzuki, H., Katoh, E., Iuchi, S., Kobayashi, M., Maeda, T., Matsuoka, M., & Yamaguchi, I. (2006). Identification and characterization of Arabidopsis gibberellin receptors. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02748.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.