The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of the sucrose synthase gene family in Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The properties and expression patterns of the six isoforms of sucrose synthase in Arabidopsis are described, and their functions are explored through analysis of T‐DNA insertion mutants. The isoforms have generally similar kinetic properties. Although there is variation in sensitivity to substrate inhibition by fructose this is unlikely to be of major physiological significance. No two isoforms have the same spatial and temporal expression patterns. Some are highly expressed in specific locations, whereas others are more generally expressed. More than one isoform is expressed in all organs examined. Mutant plants lacking individual isoforms have no obvious growth phenotypes, and are not significantly different from wild‐type plants in starch, sugar and cellulose content, seed weight or seed composition under the growth conditions employed. Double mutants lacking the pairs of similar isoforms sus2 and sus3, and sus5 and sus6, are also not significantly different in these respects from wild‐type plants. These results are surprising in the light of the marked phenotypes observed when individual isoforms are eliminated in crop plants including pea, maize, potato and cotton. A sus1/sus4 double mutant grows normally in well‐aerated conditions, but shows marked growth retardation and accumulation of sugars when roots are subjected to hypoxia. The sucrose synthase activity in roots of this mutant is 3% or less of wild‐type activity. Thus under well‐aerated conditions sucrose mobilization in the root can proceed almost entirely via invertases without obvious detriment to the plant, but under hypoxia there is a specific requirement for sucrose synthase activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Flooding Stress: Acclimations and Genetic Diversity
Bailey-Serres, J., & Voesenek, L. A. C. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092752 · Cited by 1,725
An Overview of Sucrose Synthases in Plants
Stein, O., & Granot, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00095 · Cited by 717
Physiological and developmental regulation of seed oil production
Baud, S., & Lepiniec, L. (2010) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2010.01.001 · Cited by 526
Sucrose: metabolite and signaling molecule
Wind, J., Smeekens, S., & Hanson, J. (2010) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.07.007 · Cited by 392
Storage Reserve Accumulation in Arabidopsis: Metabolic and Developmental Control of Seed Filling
Baud, S., Dubreucq, B., Miquel, M., Rochat, C., & Lepiniec, L. (2008) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0113 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Bieniawska, Z., Paul Barratt, D. H., Garlick, A. P., Thole, V., Kruger, N. J., Martin, C., Zrenner, R., & Smith, A. M.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-02-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 810-828
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2140978794
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of the sucrose synthase gene family in Arabidopsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.03011.x
- The paper
- Bieniawska, Z., Paul Barratt, D. H., Garlick, A. P., Thole, V., Kruger, N. J., Martin, C., Zrenner, R., & Smith, A. M. (2007). Analysis of the sucrose synthase gene family in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.03011.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.