Cited by 79Dengue and Mosquito Control ResearchMosquito-borne diseases and controlMalaria Research and Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effectiveness of dengue control practices in household water containers in Northeast Thailand

Open access
Phuanukoonnon, Suparat, Mueller, Ivo, Bryan, Joan H.·2005·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

Summary: Objective To investigate the influence of larval control methods (using temephos, keeping fish and covering containers with lids), water use and weekly cleaning of containers on the presence of Aedes aegypti larvae in water‐storage containers in rural and urban households in Khon Kaen province. Method Cross‐sectional questionnaire survey and larval survey covered 966 households and 5821 containers were inspected. Result In rural and urban areas larval control was patchy and often ineffective. Consequently, the mosquito indices exceed the target indices for dengue control with the Breteau Indices of 201 and 113, and Container Indices of 25 and 28 in rural and urban areas, respectively. The containers most frequently infested with larvae were rectangular cement containers storing water for bathing (rural: 37.2%; urban: 35%) and flushing the toilets (rural: 35.7%; urban: 34.3%). Keeping fish [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.08–0.16] was the most effective methods of control. Correctly covering containers with lids was similarly effective (AOR: 0.10–0.25) when used on jars for storing drinking water. However, frequent use of containers reduced the effectiveness of lids. Temephos was effective only in dragon jars in urban areas (AOR: 0.46) where a standard package of temephos were available. Weekly cleaning of containers was an effective method for larval control in most types of containers. A combination of control methods increased effectiveness. Conclusion This study highlights the complex interaction of household water use and larval control practices as well as the importance of determining the most effective control measures compatible with water practices for implementing control promotion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01452.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Chansaeng J, 1993, Dristribution of Aedes aegypti in rural areas. 1989–1991, Medical Science Journal, 35, 91
  2. Charoensook O, 1985, Prevalence of Aedes mosquitoes in big cement jars and rainwater tanks, Communicable Disease Journal, 11, 247
  3. Division of Epidemiology, 2004, DF/DHF/DSS Report
  4. FlemmingM GibneySFA MabundaSJA&MahmudST(1997)Major foci ofAedes aegypti the principal vector of dengue in two villages of Northeast Thailand.Unpublished Thesis Master of Tropical Health The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland.
  5. Phanthumachinda B, 1985, Studies on community participation in Aedes aegypti control at Phanus Nikhom district, Chonburi Province, Thailand, Mosquito borne Disease Bulletin, 2, 1
  6. PhuanukoonnonS(2003)Knowledge belief and practices on dengue vector control: a comparison study between rural and urban communities in northeast Thailand.Unpublished Thesis Doctor of Philosophy University of Queensland Brisbane.
  7. Silapanuntakul S, 1994, Field Evaluation of Abate and Larvitab against Aedes saegypti larvae
  8. Stata Corp., 2001, Stata Reference Su ‐ Z
  9. Wangroongsarb Y, 1998, Dengue control in Thailand, Public Health, 14, 32

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Phuanukoonnon, S., Mueller, I., & Bryan, J. H.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Phuanukoonnon, Suparat
  • Bryan, Joan H.
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07-21
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
755-763
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W2149326500
Cited by
79
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Queensland
  • Khon Kaen University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
Keywords
dengue control, Aedes aegypti, larval control, household water containers, temephos, container cleaning, Breteau index, container index, urban-rural differences, Khon Kaen Province
MeSH terms
Temefos, Aedes, Animals, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dengue, Female, Fishes, Health Surveys, Household Articles, Humans, Hygiene, Insect Vectors, Insecticides, Larva, Male, Rural Health, Thailand, Urban Health, Water Supply

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review