Combining drinking water treatment and hand washing for diarrhoea prevention, a cluster randomised controlled trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of point of use water treatment with flocculent-disinfectant on reducing diarrhoea and the additional benefit of promoting hand washing with soap. METHODS: The study was conducted in squatter settlements of Karachi, Pakistan, where diarrhoea is a leading cause of childhood death. Interventions were randomly assigned to 47 neighbourhoods. Households in 10 neighbourhoods received diluted bleach and a water vessel; nine neighbourhoods received soap and were encouraged to wash hands; nine neighbourhoods received flocculent-disinfectant water treatment and a water vessel; 10 neighbourhoods received disinfectant-disinfectant water treatment and soap and were encouraged to wash hands; and nine neighbourhoods were followed as controls. Field workers visited households at least once a week from April to December 2003 to promote use of the interventions and to collect data on diarrhoea. RESULTS: Study participants in control neighbourhoods had diarrhoea on 5.2% of days. Compared to controls, participants living in intervention neighbourhoods had a lower prevalence of diarrhoea: 55% (95% CI 17%, 80%) lower in bleach and water vessel neighbourhoods, 51% (95% CI 12%, 76%) lower in hand washing promotion with soap neighbourhoods, 64% lower (95% CI 29%, 90%) in disinfectant-disinfectant neighbourhoods, and 55% (95% CI 18%, 80%) lower in disinfectant-disinfectant plus hand washing with soap neighbourhoods. CONCLUSIONS: With an intense community-based intervention and supplies provided free of cost, each of the home-based interventions significantly reduced diarrhoea. There was no benefit by combining hand washing promotion with water treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 173
- Authors
- Luby, S. P., Agboatwalla, M., Painter, J., Altaf, A., Billhimer, W., Keswick, B., & Hoekstra, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
- Aga Khan University (PK)
- Procter & Gamble (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Tropical Medicine & International Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03-23
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 479-489
- ISSN
- 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3156
- OpenAlex
- W1584701487
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
- Keywords
- diarrhea prevention, household water treatment, household bleach, handwashing with soap, community-based intervention, informal settlements, childhood diarrhea, diarrhea prevalence, Karachi
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Breast Feeding, Child, Child, Preschool, Diarrhea, Disinfectants, Female, Hand Disinfection, Humans, Infant, Male, Pakistan, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Soaps, Socioeconomic Factors, Sodium Hypochlorite, Water Supply, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Water Purification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review