Cited by 173Child Nutrition and Water AccessWater Treatment and DisinfectionViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology

Combining drinking water treatment and hand washing for diarrhoea prevention, a cluster randomised controlled trial

Luby, Stephen P., Agboatwalla, Mubina, Painter, John, Altaf, Arshad, Billhimer, Ward, Keswick, Bruce, Hoekstra, Robert M.·2006·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of point of use water treatment with flocculent-disinfectant on reducing diarrhoea and the additional benefit of promoting hand washing with soap. METHODS: The study was conducted in squatter settlements of Karachi, Pakistan, where diarrhoea is a leading cause of childhood death. Interventions were randomly assigned to 47 neighbourhoods. Households in 10 neighbourhoods received diluted bleach and a water vessel; nine neighbourhoods received soap and were encouraged to wash hands; nine neighbourhoods received flocculent-disinfectant water treatment and a water vessel; 10 neighbourhoods received disinfectant-disinfectant water treatment and soap and were encouraged to wash hands; and nine neighbourhoods were followed as controls. Field workers visited households at least once a week from April to December 2003 to promote use of the interventions and to collect data on diarrhoea. RESULTS: Study participants in control neighbourhoods had diarrhoea on 5.2% of days. Compared to controls, participants living in intervention neighbourhoods had a lower prevalence of diarrhoea: 55% (95% CI 17%, 80%) lower in bleach and water vessel neighbourhoods, 51% (95% CI 12%, 76%) lower in hand washing promotion with soap neighbourhoods, 64% lower (95% CI 29%, 90%) in disinfectant-disinfectant neighbourhoods, and 55% (95% CI 18%, 80%) lower in disinfectant-disinfectant plus hand washing with soap neighbourhoods. CONCLUSIONS: With an intense community-based intervention and supplies provided free of cost, each of the home-based interventions significantly reduced diarrhoea. There was no benefit by combining hand washing promotion with water treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2006.01592.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 173

Authors
Luby, S. P., Agboatwalla, M., Painter, J., Altaf, A., Billhimer, W., Keswick, B., & Hoekstra, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Aga Khan University (PK)
  • Procter & Gamble (United States) (US)
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-23
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
479-489
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W1584701487
Cited by
173
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Keywords
diarrhea prevention, household water treatment, household bleach, handwashing with soap, community-based intervention, informal settlements, childhood diarrhea, diarrhea prevalence, Karachi
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Breast Feeding, Child, Child, Preschool, Diarrhea, Disinfectants, Female, Hand Disinfection, Humans, Infant, Male, Pakistan, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Soaps, Socioeconomic Factors, Sodium Hypochlorite, Water Supply, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Water Purification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review