The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patient retention in antiretroviral therapy programs up to three years on treatment in sub‐Saharan Africa, 2007–2009: systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Objectives To estimate the proportion of all‐cause adult patient attrition from antiretroviral therapy (ART) programs in service delivery settings in sub‐Saharan Africa through 36 months on treatment. Methods We identified cohorts within Ovid Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and four conference abstract archives. We summarized retention rates from studies describing observational cohorts from sub‐Saharan Africa reporting on adult HIV 1‐ infected patients initiating first‐line three‐drug ART. We estimated all‐cause attrition rates for 6, 12, 18, 24, or 36 months after ART initiation including patients who died or were lost to follow‐up (as defined by the author), but excluding transferred patients. Results We analysed 33 sources describing 39 cohorts and 226 307 patients. Patients were more likely to be female (median 65%) and had a median age at initiation of 37 (range 34–40). Median starting CD4 count was 109 cells/mm 3. Loss to follow‐up was the most common cause of attrition (59%), followed by death (41%). Median attrition at 12, 24 and 36 months was 22.6% (range 7%–45%), 25% (range 11%–32%) and 29.5% (range 13%–36.1%) respectively. After pooling data in a random‐effects meta‐analysis, retention declined from 86.1% at 6 months to 80.2% at 12 months, 76.8% at 24 months and 72.3% at 36 months. Adjusting for variable follow‐up time in a sensitivity analysis, 24 month retention was 70.0% (range: 66.7%–73.3%), while 36 month retention was 64.6% (range: 57.5%–72.1%). Conclusions Our findings document the difficulties in retaining patients in care for lifelong treatment, and the progress being made in raising overall retention rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cited by
Sanne, I., Orrell, C., Fox, M. P., Conradie, F., Ive, P., Zeinecker, J., Cornell, M., Heiberg, C., Ingram, C., Panchia, R., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60894-x · Cited by 248
Self-citationMacPherson, P., Houben, R. M., Glynn, J. R., Corbett, E. L., & Kranzer, K. (2014) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.13.124800 · Cited by 230
Demena, B. A., Artavia-Mora, L., Ouedraogo, D., Thiombiano, B. A., & Wagner, N. (2020) · AIDS Patient Care and STDs · doi:10.1089/apc.2019.0181 · Cited by 102
Mobile health for early retention in HIV care: a qualitative study in Kenya (WelTel Retain)
Smillie, K., Borek, N. V., Kop, M. L. V. D., Lukhwaro, A., Li, N., Karanja, S., Patel, A. R., Ojakaa, D., & Lester, R. T. (2014) · African Journal of AIDS Research · doi:10.2989/16085906.2014.961939 · Cited by 62
Haskew, J., Rø, G., Turner, K., Kimanga, D., Sirengo, M., & Sharif, S. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135361 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox, M. P., & Rosen, S.
- Venue
- Tropical Medicine & International Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-04-29
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3156
- OpenAlex
- W1531725059
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient retention in antiretroviral therapy programs up to three years on treatment in sub‐Saharan Africa, 2007–2009: systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02508.x
- The paper
- Fox, M. P., & Rosen, S. (2010). Patient retention in antiretroviral therapy programs up to three years on treatment in sub‐Saharan Africa, 2007–2009: systematic review. Tropical Medicine & International Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02508.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.