The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
A relational perspective on autonomy for older adults residing in nursing homes
Open accessAbstract
AIM: To review critically the traditional concept of autonomy, propose an alternative relational interpretation of autonomy, and discuss how this would operate in identifying and addressing ethical issues that arise in the context of nursing home care for older adults. BACKGROUND: Respect for patient autonomy has been the cornerstone of clinical bioethics for several decades. Important though this principle is, there is debate on how to interpret the core concept of autonomy. We review the appeal of the traditional approach to autonomy in health care and then identify some of the difficulties with this conception. METHODS: We use philosophical methods to explain and discuss the traditional and relational conceptions of autonomy and we illuminate our discussion with examples of various contextual applications. CONCLUSION: We support the relational conception of autonomy as offering a richer, more contextualized understanding of autonomy which attends to the social, political and economic conditions that serve as background to an agent's deliberations. To illuminate these ideas, we discuss the situation of frail older adults who frequently find their autonomy limited not only by their medical conditions but also by cultural prejudices against the aged and by the conditions commonly found within the nursing homes in which many reside. We propose ways of improving the relational autonomy of this population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 159
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- MacKenzie, 2000, Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, 10.1093/oso/9780195123333.001.0001 · DOI
- Christman, 2004, Relational autonomy, liberal individualism, and the social constitution of selves, Philosophical Studies, 117, 89, 10.1023/B:PHIL.0000014532.56866.5c · DOI
- Meyers, 1989, Self, Society, and Personal Choice
- Young, 1990, Justice and the Politics of Difference
- McLeod, 2000, Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, 259, 10.1093/oso/9780195123333.003.0012 · DOI
- Williams, 2007, Invisible, unequal, and forgotten: health disparities in the elderly, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy, 21, 442
- Canadian Healthcare Association, 2009, Policy brief: New Directions For Facility-based Long-Term Care
- Gale, 1989, Advocacy for elderly autonomy: a challenge to community health nurses, Journal of Community Health Nursing, 6, 191, 10.1207/s15327655jchn0604_2 · DOI
- Kane, 1997, Everyday matters in the lives of nursing home residents: wish for and perception of choice and control, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45, 1086, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05971.x · DOI
- Scott, 2003, Autonomy, privacy, and informed consent 3: elderly care perspective, British Journal of Nursing, 12, 158, 10.12968/bjon.2003.12.1.10999 · DOI
- Shawler, 2001, Analysis of key decision-making incidents in the life of a nursing home resident, The Gerontologist, 41, 612, 10.1093/geront/41.5.612 · DOI
- Young, 2004, Female Body Experience: “Throwing Like a Girl” and Other Essays, 155
- Armstrong, 2009, A Place to Call Home: Long-Term Care in Canada
- Butterworth, 2005, Ongoing consent to care for older people in care homes, Nursing Standard, 19, 40, 10.7748/ns2005.01.19.20.40.c3791 · DOI
- Hughes, 2009, “I Just Take What I Am Given” Adherence and resident involvement in decision making on medicines in nursing homes for older people: a qualitative survey, Drugs and Aging, 26, 505, 10.2165/00002512-200926060-00007 · DOI
- Thompson, 2008, A new model for long-term care: balancing palliative and restorative care delivery, Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 22, 169, 10.1080/02763890802232014 · DOI
- Lanoix, 2010, Triangulating care, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 3, 138, 10.2979/fab.2010.3.1.138 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Sherwin, S., & Winsby, M.
- Affiliations
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Western University (CA)
- Venue
- Health Expectations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-28
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 182-190
- ISSN
- 1369-6513 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5060573
- OpenAlex
- W1893634457
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Expectations (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Patient Dignity and Privacy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Keywords
- relational autonomy, patient autonomy, nursing homes, older adults, bioethics, frailty
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aging, Decision Making, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Nursing Homes, Philosophy, Medical, Social Justice, Mental Competency, Personal Autonomy, Patient Rights
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
