The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determinants of increased exhaled nitric oxide in patients with suspected asthma
Open accessAbstract
Exhaled nitric oxide (FE NO) has been proposed as a marker of asthmatic inflammation, but it is unclear whether FE NO in clinical use selects patients primarily according to their atopic or asthmatic status. The aim of this study was to investigate the determinants of increased FE NO in patients with suspected asthma, by means of multinomial logistic regression analysis. The FE NO of 132 patients referred because of symptoms suggestive of asthma were studied, and the explanatory factors tested included atopy according to prick skin tests, clinical asthma according to lung function tests, sputum eosinophilia and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Slightly elevated FE NO levels were significantly explained only by sputum eosinophilia (OR: 3.7; 95% CI: 1.1–13.1; P = 0.04), but for high levels of FE NO (≥3 SD of predicted), clinical asthma (OR: 16.3; 95% CI: 5.4–49.7; P < 0.0001) and sputum eosinophilia (OR: 12.0; 95% CI: 4.1–35.0; P > 0.0001) were the characteristics with the highest prediction, followed by atopy and BHR. A significant interaction between asthma and atopy was observed relating to the effect on high FE NO, but further analyses stratified by atopy showed significant associations between asthma and high FE NO both in atopic and nonatopic patients. We conclude that in patients with symptoms suggesting asthma, slightly elevated and high levels of FE NO are associated with sputum eosinophilia, whereas asthma is significantly associated only with high levels of FE NO, irrespective of atopy. The results suggest that FE NO is primarily a marker of airway eosinophilia, and that only high values of FE NO may be useful to identify patients with atopic or nonatopic asthma.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FENO concentration is an indicator of primarily eosinophilic inflammation in the respiratory tract.
“Exhaled NO concentration was used as an indicator of primarily eosinophilic inflammation in the respiratory tract. [33]”
From Occupational exposure to trichloramine and trihalomethanes: adverse health effects among personnel in habilitation and rehabilitation swimming pools (2019) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.16d32.x · DOI
- 10.1164/rccm.200310-1376OC · DOI
- 10.1136/thorax.58.6.494 · DOI
- 10.1164/ajrccm.162.3.9909033 · DOI
- 10.1164/ajrccm.164.8.2101145 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13b14.x · DOI
- 10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9804134 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14d28.x · DOI
- 10.1164/ajrccm/146.2.500 · DOI
- 10.1164/ajrccm.154.5.8912771 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.163.11.6321 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-5699(99)01535-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0954-6111(03)00136-7 · DOI
- 10.1164/ajrccm.152.2.7543345 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00075.x · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00098.x · DOI
- 10.1183/09041950.005s1693 · DOI
- 10.1378/chest.104.1.164 · DOI
- 10.1183/09031936.97.10071683 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2281.2000.00277.x · DOI
- 10.1053/rmed.2000.0970 · DOI
- 10.1053/rmed.2001.1215 · DOI
- 10.1164/ajrccm.158.4.9707143 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01888.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0954-6111(03)00122-7 · DOI
- Kharitonov SA, 1995, Increased nitric oxide in exhaled air of normal human subjects with upper respiratory infections, Eur Respir J, 9, 1130
- 10.1183/09031936.00.16582400 · DOI
- 10.1053/rmed.2002.1378 · DOI
- 10.1164/ajrccm/136.1.225 · DOI
- Walker C, 1992, Allergic and nonallergic asthma have distinct patterns of T‐cell activation and cytokine production in peripheral blood and BAL, Am Rev Respir Dis, 146, 109, 10.1164/ajrccm/146.1.109 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Westerlund, J., Bryngelsson, I.-L., Löfstedt, H., Eriksson, K., Westberg, H., & Graff, P. (2019) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · doi:10.1080/15459624.2018.1536825 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Malmberg, L. P., Turpeinen, H., Rytilä, P., Sarna, S., & Haahtela, T.
- Affiliations
- Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Malmberg, L. P.
- Venue
- Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-02
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 464-468
- ISSN
- 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
- 1398-9995
- OpenAlex
- W2075434784
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Allergy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Keywords
- exhaled nitric oxide, asthma, airway eosinophilia, sputum eosinophilia, atopy, airway hyperresponsiveness, asthma phenotyping, airway inflammation biomarkers, skin prick test, lung function
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Asthma, Diagnosis, Differential, Eosinophilia, Female, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Male, Middle Aged, Nitric Oxide, Sputum, Logistic Models, Bronchial Hyperreactivity, Exhalation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review