Cited by 51Asthma and respiratory diseasesOccupational exposure and asthmaChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Determinants of increased exhaled nitric oxide in patients with suspected asthma

Open access

Abstract

Exhaled nitric oxide (FE NO) has been proposed as a marker of asthmatic inflammation, but it is unclear whether FE NO in clinical use selects patients primarily according to their atopic or asthmatic status. The aim of this study was to investigate the determinants of increased FE NO in patients with suspected asthma, by means of multinomial logistic regression analysis. The FE NO of 132 patients referred because of symptoms suggestive of asthma were studied, and the explanatory factors tested included atopy according to prick skin tests, clinical asthma according to lung function tests, sputum eosinophilia and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Slightly elevated FE NO levels were significantly explained only by sputum eosinophilia (OR: 3.7; 95% CI: 1.1–13.1; P = 0.04), but for high levels of FE NO (≥3 SD of predicted), clinical asthma (OR: 16.3; 95% CI: 5.4–49.7; P < 0.0001) and sputum eosinophilia (OR: 12.0; 95% CI: 4.1–35.0; P > 0.0001) were the characteristics with the highest prediction, followed by atopy and BHR. A significant interaction between asthma and atopy was observed relating to the effect on high FE NO, but further analyses stratified by atopy showed significant associations between asthma and high FE NO both in atopic and nonatopic patients. We conclude that in patients with symptoms suggesting asthma, slightly elevated and high levels of FE NO are associated with sputum eosinophilia, whereas asthma is significantly associated only with high levels of FE NO, irrespective of atopy. The results suggest that FE NO is primarily a marker of airway eosinophilia, and that only high values of FE NO may be useful to identify patients with atopic or nonatopic asthma.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00740.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.16d32.x · DOI
  2. 10.1164/rccm.200310-1376OC · DOI
  3. 10.1136/thorax.58.6.494 · DOI
  4. 10.1164/ajrccm.162.3.9909033 · DOI
  5. 10.1164/ajrccm.164.8.2101145 · DOI
  6. 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.13b14.x · DOI
  7. 10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9804134 · DOI
  8. 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14d28.x · DOI
  9. 10.1164/ajrccm/146.2.500 · DOI
  10. 10.1164/ajrccm.154.5.8912771 · DOI
  11. 10.4049/jimmunol.163.11.6321 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0167-5699(99)01535-2 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0954-6111(03)00136-7 · DOI
  14. 10.1164/ajrccm.152.2.7543345 · DOI
  15. 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00075.x · DOI
  16. 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00098.x · DOI
  17. 10.1183/09041950.005s1693 · DOI
  18. 10.1378/chest.104.1.164 · DOI
  19. 10.1183/09031936.97.10071683 · DOI
  20. 10.1046/j.1365-2281.2000.00277.x · DOI
  21. 10.1053/rmed.2000.0970 · DOI
  22. 10.1053/rmed.2001.1215 · DOI
  23. 10.1164/ajrccm.158.4.9707143 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01888.x · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0954-6111(03)00122-7 · DOI
  26. Kharitonov SA, 1995, Increased nitric oxide in exhaled air of normal human subjects with upper respiratory infections, Eur Respir J, 9, 1130
  27. 10.1183/09031936.00.16582400 · DOI
  28. 10.1053/rmed.2002.1378 · DOI
  29. 10.1164/ajrccm/136.1.225 · DOI
  30. Walker C, 1992, Allergic and nonallergic asthma have distinct patterns of T‐cell activation and cytokine production in peripheral blood and BAL, Am Rev Respir Dis, 146, 109, 10.1164/ajrccm/146.1.109 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Malmberg, L. P., Turpeinen, H., Rytilä, P., Sarna, S., & Haahtela, T.
Affiliations
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Malmberg, L. P.
Venue
Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-02-02
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
464-468
ISSN
  • 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
  • 1398-9995
OpenAlex
W2075434784
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Allergy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
exhaled nitric oxide, asthma, airway eosinophilia, sputum eosinophilia, atopy, airway hyperresponsiveness, asthma phenotyping, airway inflammation biomarkers, skin prick test, lung function
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Asthma, Diagnosis, Differential, Eosinophilia, Female, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Male, Middle Aged, Nitric Oxide, Sputum, Logistic Models, Bronchial Hyperreactivity, Exhalation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review