CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 566Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsGenomics and Rare Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A cytogenetic survey of 14,069 newborn infants: I. Incidence of chromosome abnormalities

Hamerton, J. L., Canning, N., Ray, M., Smith, S.·1975·Clinical Genetics
DOI 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1975.tb01498.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Data from a chromosome examination of 14,069 consecutive newborn infants is presented. Successful karyotypes were obtained on 13,939 babies using short-term blood cultures and conventional staining methods. Of those, 13,645 babies had normal chromosomes; 64 (0.46%) had a major chromosome abnormality; and 230 (1.65%) had a marker chromosome; giving a total of 294 (2.11%) babies with a major chromosome abnormality or distinctive marker chromosomes. Six male babies with sex chromosome abnormalities had a 47,XXY and four a 47,XYY karyotype, and three were mixoploids. Five female babies had a 47,XXX karytotype and two were mixoploids. There were three babies with ambiguous external genitalia, all with normal karyotypes. Fourteen babies had 21-trisomy; there were three 18-trisomics and one 13-trisomic. The mother of one 18-trisomy baby had a balanced (18;21) translocation. Twenty-four infants had a balanced chromosome rearrangement. Eleven of these were reciprocal and thirteen were Robertsonian translocations. One baby had an unbalanced derivative chromosome resulting from an 18;11 insertion. Two infants with additional unidentified fragments were detected. Two hundred and thirty babies (1:60) carying distinctive chromosome variants were detected. The commonest variant was the Yq+ among males (0.89%). Other common variants involved the short arms of the D and G groups (0.32% and 0.57%, respectively) 16q+ (0.09%), and 1q+ (0.04%). The results of the present study when combined with five other comparable studies, thus comprising a total of 46,150 newborn infants, indicates that the frequency of major chromosome abnormalities is between 1:150 and 1:200 live-born babies. This represents a small proportion of all conceptuses with chromosome abnormalities, which has been estimated as being approximately 1:20. It is thus clear that chromosome abnormalities form a major part of the genetic load carried by the human population. The development of chromosome banding techniques already has increased, and with further increase, the complexities of human cytogenetics and may reveal many additional rearrangements undetectable by conventional methods.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1975.tb01498.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Conen P. E., 1966, Frequency and occurrence of chromosomal syndromes. II. E‐trisomy, Amer. J. hum. Genet., 18, 374
  2. Conen P. E., 1966, Frequency and occurrence of chromosomal syndromes. II. E‐trisomy, Amer. J. hum. Genet., 18, 387
  3. Hamerton J. L., 1971, Human Cytogenrrics
  4. Statistics Canada, 1969, Catalogue, 84
  5. Statistics Canada, 1970, Catalogue, 84
  6. Statistics Canada, 1972, Catalogue 84–201
  7. Statistics Canada, 1974, Bulletin, Catalogue 95–753
  8. Walzer S., 1972, Chromosome abnormalities in 11,154 newborn infants, Amer. J. hum. Genet., 24, 38a

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 566

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hamerton, J. L., Canning, N., Ray, M., & Smith, S.
Affiliations
Health Sciences Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Hamerton, J. L.
ORCID
Ray, M.
Venue
Clinical Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1975-10
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
223-243
ISSN
  • 0009-9163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-0004
DOI
10.1111/j.1399-0004.1975.tb01498.x
OpenAlex
W2145074440
Cited by
565
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
13.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 11893 d)
Locations
  • Clinical Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
chromosomal abnormalities, neonates, karyotype, marker chromosomes, sex chromosome abnormalities, Klinefelter syndrome, 47,XYY, 47,XXX, Down syndrome, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, balanced translocation, Robertsonian translocation, reciprocal translocation, genetic load
MeSH terms
Canada, Chromosome Aberrations, Chromosomes, Human, 13-15, Chromosomes, Human, 16-18, Chromosomes, Human, 21-22 and Y, Female, Genetics, Population, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Karyotyping, Male, Sex Chromatin, Sex Chromosome Aberrations, Sex Chromosomes, Sex Factors, Translocation, Genetic, Trisomy, Genetic Variation, Chromosome Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review