The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HLA DNA typing: past, present, and future
Abstract
The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and class II loci are the most polymorphic genes in the human genome, with a highly clustered and patchwork pattern of sequence motifs. In the three decades since the first HLA gene was isolated by molecular cloning (a cDNA clone of HLA‐B7), thousands of alleles have been identified and the names and sequences of all known alleles have been curated in the IMGT/HLA database. This extensive allelic diversity made and continues to make high‐resolution HLA DNA typing very challenging. The first attempt at HLA DNA typing involved restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, but this approach had many limitations. The development of PCR in 1985 allowed for the amplification of the polymorphic exons of the HLA class I and class II genes and the analysis of the polymorphic sequence motifs with sequence‐specific oligonucleotide (SSO) hybridization probes. The immobilization of these probes on membranes and later on beads, along with primer sets for sequence‐specific priming (SSP), gave rise to the current set of HLA typing reagents. Sanger sequencing has provided high‐resolution typing but, in many cases, genotyping ‘ambiguity’ remains an issue. In the past few years, the introduction of next‐generation sequencing, with the critical properties of massively parallel and clonal sequencing, has significantly reduced HLA genotyping ambiguity. Here, our lab's efforts to develop high‐resolution and high‐throughput HLA DNA typing using the 454 Sequencing System are reviewed, and the potential future developments and applications of HLA DNA typing are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequencing technologies – the next generation
Metzker, M. L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2626 · Cited by 7,066
Cited by
Landscape of genomic alterations in cervical carcinomas
Ojesina, A. I., Lichtenstein, L., Freeman, S. S., Pedamallu, C. S., Imaz-Rosshandler, I., Pugh, T. J., Cherniack, A. D., Ambrogio, L., Cibulskis, K., Bertelsen, B., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12881 · Cited by 867
Cost-efficient high-throughput HLA typing by MiSeq amplicon sequencing
Lange, V., Böhme, I., Hofmann, J., Lang, K., Sauter, J., Schöne, B., Paul, P., Albrecht, V., Andreas, J. M., Baier, D. M., et al. (2014) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-63 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Erlich, H.
- Venue
- Tissue Antigens
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0001-2815 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-0039
- OpenAlex
- W1968789418
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HLA DNA typing: past, present, and future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-0039.2012.01881.x
- The paper
- Erlich, H. (2012). HLA DNA typing: past, present, and future. Tissue Antigens. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0039.2012.01881.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.