Cited by 77Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

Reduction of periodontal pathogens adhesion by antagonistic strains

Open access
Van Hoogmoed, C. G., Geertsema‐doornbusch, G. I., Teughels, W., Quirynen, M., Busscher, H. J., Van der Mei, H. C.·2008·Oral Microbiology and Immunology

Abstract

Introduction: Periodontitis results from a shift in the subgingival microflora into a more pathogenic direction with Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans considered as periodontopathogens. In many cases, treatment procures only a temporary shift towards a less pathogenic microflora. An alternative treatment could be the deliberate colonization of pockets with antagonistic microorganisms to control the adhesion of periodontopathogens. The aim of this study was to identify bacterial strains that reduce adhesion of periodontopathogens to surfaces. Methods: Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus crista, Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus mitis, Actinomyces naeslundii, and Haemophilus parainfluenzae were evaluated as potential antagonists against P. gingivalis ATCC 33277, P. intermedia ATCC 49046, and A. actinomycetemcomitans ATCC 43718 as periodontopathogens. Adhesion of periodontopathogens to the bottom plate of a parallel plate flow chamber was studied in the absence (control) and the presence of pre‐adhering antagonistic strains up to a surface coverage of 5%. Results: The largest reduction caused by antagonistic strains was observed for P. gingivalis. All antagonistic strains except S. crista ATCC 49999 inhibited the adhesion of P. gingivalis by at least 1.6 cells per adhering antagonist, with the largest significant reduction observed for A. naeslundii ATCC 51655 (3.8 cells per adhering antagonist). Adhering antagonists had a minimal effect on the adhesion of A. actinomycetemcomitans ATCC 43718. Intermediate but significant reductions were perceived for P. intermedia, most notably caused by S. mitis BMS. Conclusion: The adhesion of P. gingivalis was inhibited best by antagonistic strains, while S. mitis BMS appeared to be the most successful antagonist.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-302x.2007.00388.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus cristatus, S salivarius, S mitis, Actinomyces naeslundii, and Haemophilus parainfluenzae have been shown to decrease the ability of P gingivalis to adhere to substrate.

    “Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus cristatus, S salivarius, S mitis, Actinomyces naeslundii, and Haemophilus parainfluenzae have been shown to decrease the ability by P gingivalis to adhere to substrate.162, 163”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 77

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Academy of Periodontology. Consensus report periodontal diseases: pathogenesis and microbial factors. Pro- ceedings of the 1996 World Workshop in Periodontics. Ann Periodontol 1996: I: 926-932.

Authors
Van Hoogmoed, C. G., Geertsema‐doornbusch, G. I., Teughels, W., Quirynen, M., Busscher, H. J., & Van der Mei, H. C.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Venue
Oral Microbiology and Immunology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-19
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
43-48
ISSN
  • 0902-0055 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-302X
OpenAlex
W2129580296
Cited by
77
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oral Microbiology and Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r21de015360-01)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (1R21 DE015360-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
periodontal pathogens, bacterial adhesion, antagonistic bacteria, periodontitis, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus salivarius, Actinomyces naeslundii, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, subgingival microbiota, competitive exclusion, periodontal treatment
MeSH terms
Actinomyces, Antibiosis, Bacterial Adhesion, Bacteriological Techniques, Humans, Periodontitis, Streptococcus, Streptococcus sanguis, Colony Count, Microbial, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Streptococcus mitis, Haemophilus parainfluenzae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review