The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Internal Leaf Area and Cellular CO2 Resistance: Photosynthetic Implications of Variations with Growth Conditions and Plant Species
Abstract
The influences of illumination, temperature, and soil water potential during development on leaf thickness, mesophyll cell wall area per unit leaf area (Ames/A), and the cellular CO 2, resistance expressed on a mesophyll cell wall area basis (rCO2cell,) were examined for Plectranthus parviflorus Henckel. Although the ranges of all three growth conditions caused at least 9‐fold variations in the leaf biomass produced in 4 weeks, only the illumination had a major effect on internal leaf morphology, e.g. the thickness went from 279 to 831 μ m and Ames/A from 10.5 to 34.8 as the photosynthetically active radiation was raised from 3 to 53 nEinsteins cm−2 s−1, while rCO2cell remained close to 154 s cm−1. Variations in the growth temperature, soil water potential, and the nutritional status of the plant, affected photosynthesis mainly by changes in rCO2cell. To compare the influence of internal leaf area on photosynthesis for other plants, especially those with low Ames/A values, the maximum rates of CO 2 uptake at light saturation and photosynthetically optimal temperatures were also determined for a moss, Mnium ciliare (C. Muell.) Schimp., and two ferns, Adiantum decorum Moore and Alsophila australe R. Br. As A mes/A went from 2.00 for the moss to 3.8, 7.5, 11.7, and 20.8 for the fens, the illumination at light saturation and the maximum rate of photosynthesis both progressively increased. The cellular CO 2 resistance, which theoretically might have a lower limit of 20 s cm−1, ranged from 85 to 190 s cm−1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Leaf specific mass confounds leaf density and thickness
Witkowski, E. T. F., & Lamont, B. B. (1991) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00317710 · Cited by 770
Mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2: An unappreciated central player in photosynthesis
Flexas, J., Barbour, M. M., Brendel, O., Cabrera, H. M., Carriquí, M., Díaz-Espejo, A., Douthe, C., Dreyer, E., Ferrio, J. P., Gago, J., et al. (2012) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.05.009 · Cited by 756
NIINEMETS, Ü. (1999) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00466.x · Cited by 750
Koike, T. (1988) · Plant Species Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-1984.1988.tb00173.x · Cited by 306
REICH, P. B., WALTERS, M. B., & ELLSWORTH, D. S. (1991) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01499.x · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- NOBEL, P. S.
- Venue
- Physiologia Plantarum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-144
- ISSN
- 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3054
- OpenAlex
- W2041655193
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Internal Leaf Area and Cellular CO2 Resistance: Photosynthetic Implications of Variations with Growth Conditions and Plant Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1977.tb01510.x
- The paper
- NOBEL, P. S. (1977). Internal Leaf Area and Cellular CO2 Resistance: Photosynthetic Implications of Variations with Growth Conditions and Plant Species. Physiologia Plantarum. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1977.tb01510.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.