Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heavy metal‐induced accumulation of free proline in a metal‐tolerant and a nontolerant ecotype of Silene vulgaris

Schat, Henk, Sharma, Shanti S., Vooijs, Riet·1997·Physiologia Plantarum

Abstract

Accumulation of free proline in response to Cu, Cd and Zn was studied in nontolerant and metal‐tolerant Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke. In the nontolerant ecotype these metals induced a massive accumulation of proline, especially in the leaves. When compared at equimolar concentrations in the nutrient solution, Cu was the most effective inducer, followed by Cd and Zn, respectively. However, when compared at equal toxic strength, as estimated from the degree of root growth inhibition, proline accumulation decreased in the order Cd > Zn > Cu. The threshold exposure levels for proline accumulation coincided with the highest no‐effect‐concentrations for root growth. In the metal‐tolerant ecotype the constitutive proline concentration in the leaves was 5 to 6 times higher than in the nontolerant ecotype. Exposure to Cu and Zn, however, was without any effect on the leaf proline concentration, even at exposure levels that caused a 50% root growth inhibition. Only Cd, when present at concentrations above the highest no‐effect‐concentration for root growth, induced a further increase of the leaf proline content. Reducing transpiration by placing the plants under a transparent polyethylene cover almost completely inhibited proline accumulation, even at metal accumulation rates in the leaves that caused a 10‐fold increase of the proline level in leaves of uncovered plants. The results demonstrate that metal‐induced proline accumulation depends on the development of a metal‐induced water deficit in the leaves. Differential metal‐induced proline accumulation in distinctly metal‐tolerant ecotypes is a consequence, rather than a cause of differential metal tolerance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb01026.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Schat, H., Sharma, S. S., & Vooijs, R.
Venue
Physiologia Plantarum
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-11
Volume
101
Issue
3
Pages
477-482
ISSN
  • 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3054
OpenAlex
W2165642297
Cited by
296
References
1
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heavy metal‐induced accumulation of free proline in a metal‐tolerant and a nontolerant ecotype of Silene vulgaris. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb01026.x
The paper
Schat, H., Sharma, S. S., & Vooijs, R. (1997). Heavy metal‐induced accumulation of free proline in a metal‐tolerant and a nontolerant ecotype of Silene vulgaris. Physiologia Plantarum. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb01026.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.