The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antioxidant defense in the leaves of C3 and C4 plants under salinity stress
Abstract
The effect of salt stress (50, 100 and 150 m M of NaCl) on the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC. 1.15.1.1), ascorbate peroxidase (APX, EC. 1.11.1.11), glutathione reductase (GR, EC. 1.6.4.2) enzymes and also on the rate of lipid peroxidation in terms of thiobarbituric acid‐reactive substances (TBARS) content and photosynthetic capacity in two wheat (C3 plants) and two maize (C4 plants) varieties was studied. In the non‐salined control plants, the antioxidant enzymes activities were significantly higher for maize than for wheat. Adding salt to the nutrient solution increased the level of antioxidants in leaves of both maize and wheat. The first substantial response to salinity was found for SOD on the 2nd day, whereas changes occurred for APX on the 4th day and for GR on the 4th/5th day of salt treatment. Although SOD activity increased considerably more in wheat (C3), it never reached as high levels as in maize (C4) grown in the same treatment combinations. The total increase in APX activity was similar for wheat and maize, whereas GR activity was higher in leaves of maize. Lipid peroxidation analyses showed an increase in TBARS contents in both plants' species grown under salinity that corresponded to the damage that occurred in secondary oxidative stress. However, as a result of advanced antioxidant defense in maize, the TBARS quantities did not elevate to as high level as in wheat. Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements revealed a considerable decrease in the efficiency of PS II and electron‐transport chain (ETC). Assimilation rate of CO 2 decreased in both plant groups; however, in C4 maize, we observed a much better capacity to preserve the photosynthetic apparatus against overproduction of ROS. Results suggest that efficient antioxidant defense plays an important role in maize, the C 4 plant, resistance to environmental stresses like salinity or drought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biotechnological approach of improving plant salt tolerance using antioxidants as markers
Ashraf, M. (2009) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.003 · Cited by 1,137
ROS homeostasis in halophytes in the context of salinity stress tolerance
Bose, J., Rodrigo-Moreno, A., & Shabala, S. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ert430 · Cited by 963
Shahid, M. A., Sarkhosh, A., Khan, N., Balal, R. M., Ali, S., Rossi, L., Gómez, C., Mattson, N., Nasim, W., & Garcia-Sanchez, F. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10070938 · Cited by 508
Stepien, P., & Johnson, G. N. (2009) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.108.132407 · Cited by 431
Self-citationHossain, M. S., & Dietz, K.-J. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00548 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Stepien, P., & Klobus, G.
- Venue
- Physiologia Plantarum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-25
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-40
- ISSN
- 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3054
- OpenAlex
- W2150990248
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antioxidant defense in the leaves of C3 and C4 plants under salinity stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00534.x
- The paper
- Stepien, P., & Klobus, G. (2005). Antioxidant defense in the leaves of C3 and C4 plants under salinity stress. Physiologia Plantarum. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00534.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.