Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 517

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mapping of punctuate hyperalgesia around a surgical incision demonstrates that ketamine is a powerful suppressor of central sensitization to pain following surgery

STUBHAUG, A., BREIVIK, H., EIDE, P. K., KREUNEN, M., Foss, A.·1997·Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Background:Tissue injury induces central sensitization in the spinal cord dorsal horn neurons via mechanisms involving N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptors, leading to secondary hyperalgesia. Using punctuate mechanical hyperalgesia as a measure of central sensitization, we examined whether induction and maintenance of central sensitization after surgery could be prevented by a low‐dose infusion of the NMDA‐receptor antagonist ketamine. Results:The area of punctuate mechanical hyperalgesia was significantly reduced in the ketamine group 1, 3 and 7 d after the operation (P< 0.01–0. 001). “Wind‐up pain” was also reduced by ketamine (P< 0.05). PCA morphine consumption and pain intensity (visual analogue scale) differed between groups only during the first hours after surgery, in favour of ketamine. The ketamine patients scored significantly higher on a global satisfaction score. Side‐effects were most frequent in the placebo group. Conclusion:Low‐dose i.v. infusion of ketamine during and after surgery reduces mechanical punctuate hyperalgesia surrounding the surgical incision. These results indicate that blockade of NMDA receptors prevents the central sensitization caused by nociceptive input during and after surgery. Methods:Twenty living kidney donors were included in a randomized, double‐blind, parallel, two‐group study. Before start of surgery 10 patients received an i.v. bolus of racemic ketamine 0.5 mg · kg‐1, followed by a continuous i.v. infusion of ketamine 2 μg‐kg‐1‐min‐1 for 24 h, thereafter 1 μg.kg‐1 min‐1 for another 48 h. The control group received placebo bolus and infusion. A standard general anaesthesia including fentanyl was used. Patient‐controlled (PCA) i.v. morphine was used for postoperative analgesia. Punctuate mechanical hyperalgesia and temporal summation of mechanical stimuli causing “wind‐up pain” were measured using von Frey filaments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04854.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 517

Metadata

Authors
STUBHAUG, A., BREIVIK, H., EIDE, P. K., KREUNEN, M., & Foss, A.
Venue
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-10
Volume
41
Issue
9
Pages
1124-1132
ISSN
  • 0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-6576
OpenAlex
W2015303667
Cited by
517
References
2
FWCI
15.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping of punctuate hyperalgesia around a surgical incision demonstrates that ketamine is a powerful suppressor of central sensitization to pain following surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04854.x
The paper
STUBHAUG, A., BREIVIK, H., EIDE, P. K., KREUNEN, M., & Foss, A. (1997). Mapping of punctuate hyperalgesia around a surgical incision demonstrates that ketamine is a powerful suppressor of central sensitization to pain following surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04854.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.