Cited by 41Animal Behavior and ReproductionOrthoptera Research and TaxonomyEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Sounds different: inbreeding depression in sexually selected traits in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus

DRAYTON, J. M., HUNT, J., BROOKS, R., JENNIONS, M. D.·2007·Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Abstract

If male sexual signalling is honest because it captures genetic variation in condition then traits that are important mate choice cues should be disproportionately affected by inbreeding relative to other traits. To test this, we investigated the effect of brother–sister mating on advertisement calling by male field crickets Teleogryllus commodus. We quantified the effect of one generation of inbreeding on nightly calling effort and five finer‐scale aspects of call structure that have been shown to influence attractiveness. We also quantified inbreeding depression on six life history traits and one morphological trait. Inbreeding significantly reduced hatching success, nymph survival and adult lifespan but had no detectable effect on hatching rate, developmental rate or adult body mass. The effect of inbreeding on sexually selected traits was equivocal. There was no decline in calling effort (seconds of sound production/night) by inbred males, but there were highly significant changes in three of five finer‐scale call parameters. Sexually selected traits clearly vary in their susceptibility to inbreeding depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01286.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sexual signals were inbreeding-dependent in studies on fish and invertebrates.

    “It has, indeed, been shown that sexual signals were inbreeding-dependent in studies on fish and invertebrates [18–21].”

    From ‘Out of tune’: consequences of inbreeding on bird song (2016) · cites this paper as [19]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DRAYTON, J. M., HUNT, J., BROOKS, R., & JENNIONS, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
DRAYTON, J. M.
Venue
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Published
2007-01-08
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
1138-1147
ISSN
  • 1010-061X (ISSN-L)
  • 1420-9101
OpenAlex
W2168564434
Cited by
41
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Evolutionary Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/B501398/2)
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Orthoptera Research and Taxonomy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
inbreeding depression, sexual selection, Teleogryllus commodus, Gryllinae, call structure, life-history traits, nymph survival, hatching success, adult lifespan, body mass
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Communication, Female, Gryllidae, Inbreeding, Male, Nymph, Body Size, Mating Preference, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review