The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
5‐Azacytidine‐treated human mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells derived from umbilical cord, cord blood and bone marrow do not generate cardiomyocytes in vitro at high frequencies
Abstract
Background and Objectives Mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells (MSCs) are multipotent progenitors that differentiate into such lineages as bone, fat, cartilage and stromal cells that support haemopoiesis. Bone marrow MSCs can also contribute to cardiac repair, although the mechanism for this is unclear. Here, we examine the potential of MSCs from different sources to generate cardiomyocytes in vitro, as a means for predicting their therapeutic potential after myocardial infarction. Materials and Methods Mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells were isolated from the perivascular tissue and Wharton's jelly of the umbilical cord and from cord blood. Their immunophenotype and differentiation potential to generate osteoblasts, chondrocytes, adipocytes and cardiomyoxcytes in vitro was compared with those of bone marrow MSCs. Results Mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells isolated from umbilical cord and cord blood were phenotypically similar to bone marrow MSCs, the exception being in the expression of CD106, which was absent on umbilical cord MSCs, and CD146 that was highly expressed in cord blood MSCs. They have variable abilities to give rise to osteoblasts, chondrocytes and adipocytes, with bone marrow MSCs being the most robust. While a small proportion (~0·07%) of bone marrow MSCs could generate cardiomyocyte‐like cells in vitro, those from umbilical cord and cord blood did not express cardiac markers either spontaneously or after treatment with 5‐azacytidine. Conclusion Although MSCs may be useful for such clinical applications as bone or cartilage repair, the results presented here indicate that such cells do not generate cardiomyocytes frequently enough for cardiac repair. Their efficacy in heart repair is likely to be due to paracrine mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gnecchi, M., He, H., Liang, O. D., Melo, L. G., Morello, F., Mu, H., Noiseux, N., Zhang, L., Pratt, R. E., Ingwall, J. S., et al. (2005) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0405-367 · Cited by 1,677
Hung, S.-C., Pochampally, R. R., Chen, S.-C., Hsu, S.-C., & Prockop, D. J. (2007) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2006-0686 · Cited by 457
Cited by
Concise Review: The Surface Markers and Identity of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Lv, F.-J., Tuan, R. S., Cheung, K. M. C., & Leung, V. Y. L. (2014) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1681 · Cited by 984
Amadeo, F., Trivino Cepeda, K., Littlewood, J., Wilm, B., Taylor, A., & Murray, P. (2021) · Emerging Topics in Life Sciences · doi:10.1042/etls20210013 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin‐Rendon, E., Sweeney, D., Lu, F., Girdlestone, J., Navarrete, C., & Watt, S. M.
- Venue
- Vox Sanguinis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07-09
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-148
- ISSN
- 0042-9007 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0410
- OpenAlex
- W1972986252
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 5‐Azacytidine‐treated human mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells derived from umbilical cord, cord blood and bone marrow do not generate cardiomyocytes in vitro at high frequencies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01076.x
- The paper
- Martin‐Rendon, E., Sweeney, D., Lu, F., Girdlestone, J., Navarrete, C., & Watt, S. M. (2008). 5‐Azacytidine‐treated human mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells derived from umbilical cord, cord blood and bone marrow do not generate cardiomyocytes in vitro at high frequencies. Vox Sanguinis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01076.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.