The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic analysis of epidermin biosynthetic genes and epidermin‐negative mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis
Open accessAbstract
Epidermin is produced by Staphylococcus epidermidis Tü3298 which harbors the 54‐kb plasmid, pTü32. The plasmid contains not only the epidermin structural gene epiA, but also a flanking DNA region which is necessary for epidermin biosynthesis. The DNA sequence of this region revealed, in addition to epiA, five additional open reading frames, epiB, C, D, Q and P [Schnell, N., Engelke, G., Augustin J., Rosenstein, R., Ungermann, V., Götz, F. & Entian, K.‐D. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 204, 57–68]. We isolated a number of stable mutants from strain Tü3298 which are unable to produce biologically active epidermin. Complementation studies using the newly constructed staphylococcal plasmid vectors pT181mcs and pCU1 led to their classification as epiA, epiB, epiC or epiD mutants. Furthermore, evidence is presented that epiB lacks its own promoter and is co‐transcribed from the epiA promoter. There is evidence that epiC and D possess their own promoters. Although epiQ and epiP mutants were not isolated, it could be shown by heterologous gene expression in S. carnosus and S. xylosus that the corresponding DNA region is involved in epidermin biosynthesis. We can not exclude the possibility that, in addition to the four open reading frames, epiA, B, C, D, and the DNA region comprising epiQ and P, host‐encoded functions are necessary for epidermin production. Thus, the genetic information for epidermin biosynthesis in S. carnosus and S. xylosus is located on an 8‐kb DNA fragment of pTü32. A further characterization of the two epiA mutants revealed that in both mutants, the preepidermin nucleotide sequence was changed. In one mutant, the mutation led to a substitution of Ser3 by Asn; in the other of Gly10 by Glu.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA
Birnboim, H. C., & Doly, J. (1979) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/7.6.1513 · Cited by 14,686
Cited by
Heilmann, C., Hussain, M., Peters, G., & Götz, F. (1997) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4101774.x · Cited by 700
Self-citationHorsburgh, M. J., Clements, M. O., Crossley, H., Ingham, E., & Foster, S. J. (2001) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.69.6.3744-3754.2001 · Cited by 365
van der Meer, J. R., Polman, J., Beerthuyzen, M. M., Siezen, R. J., Kuipers, O. P., & De Vos, W. M. (1993) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.175.9.2578-2588.1993 · Cited by 318
Gravet, A., Colin, D. A., Keller, D., Giradot, R., Monteil, H., & Prévost, G. (1998) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(98)01130-2 · Cited by 177
Xiong, A., Singh, V. K., Cabrera, G., & Jayaswal, R. K. (2000) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-146-3-659 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- AUGUSTIN, J., ROSENSTEIN, R., WIELAND, B., SCHNEIDER, U., SCHNELL, N., ENGELKE, G., ENTIAN, K., & GÖTZ, F.
- Venue
- European Journal of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 204
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1149-1154
- ISSN
- 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1033
- OpenAlex
- W2072763959
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic analysis of epidermin biosynthetic genes and epidermin‐negative mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16740.x
- The paper
- AUGUSTIN, J., ROSENSTEIN, R., WIELAND, B., SCHNEIDER, U., SCHNELL, N., ENGELKE, G., ENTIAN, K., & GÖTZ, F. (1992). Genetic analysis of epidermin biosynthetic genes and epidermin‐negative mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis. European Journal of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16740.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.