The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The functions and consensus motifs of nine types of peptide segments that form different types of nucleotide‐binding sites
Open accessAbstract
From an analysis of current data on 16 protein structures with defined nucleotide‐binding sites consensus motifs were determined for the peptide segments that form such nucleotide‐binding sites. This was done by using the actual residues shown to contact ligands in the different protein structures, plus an additional 50 sequences for various kinases. Three peptide segments are commonly required to form the binding site for ATP or GTP. Binding motif Kinase‐1a is found in almost all sequences examined, and functions in binding the phosphates of the ligand. Variant versions, comparable to Kinase‐1a, are found in a subset of proteins and appear to be related to unique functions of those enzymes. Motif Kinase‐2 contains the conserved aspartate that coordinates the metal ion on Mg‐ATP. Motif Kinase‐3 occurs in at least four versions, and functions in binding the purine base or the pentose. Two protein structures show ATP‐binding at a separate regulatory site, formed by the motifs Regulatory‐1 and Regulatory‐2. Structures for adenylate kinase and guanylate kinase show three different sequence motifs that form the binding site for a nucleoside monophosphate (NMP). NMP‐1 and NMP‐2 bind to the pentose and phosphate of the bound ligand. NMP‐1 is found in almost all the kinases that phosphorylate AMP, CMP, GMP, dTMP, or UMP. NMP‐3a is found in kinases for AMP, GMP, and UMP, while NMP‐3b binds only GMP. For the binding of NTPs, three distinct types of nucleotide‐binding fold structures have been described. Each structure is associated with a particular function (e.g. transfer of the γ‐phosphate, or of the adenylate to an acceptor) and also with a particular spatial arrangement of the three Kinase segments evident in the linear sequence for the protein.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX
Devereux, J., Haeberli, P., & Smithies, O. (1984) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/12.1part1.387 · Cited by 14,222
Walker, J. E., Saraste, M., Runswick, M. J., & Gay, N. J. (1982) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01276.x · Cited by 5,312
The Protein Kinase Family: Conserved Features and Deduced Phylogeny of the Catalytic Domains
Hanks, S. K., Quinn, A. M., & Hunter, T. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3291115 · Cited by 5,039
Proteins: Structures and Molecular Properties
Creighton, T. E. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,645
Gilbert, W. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/271501a0 · Cited by 2,300
The P-loop — a common motif in ATP- and GTP-binding proteins
Saraste, M., Sibbald, P. R., & Wittinghofer, A. (1990) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/0968-0004(90)90281-f · Cited by 2,056
Atomic structure of the actin: DNase I complex
Kabsch, W., Mannherz, H. G., Suck, D., Pai, E. F., & Holmes, K. C. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/347037a0 · Cited by 1,928
Knighton, D. R., Zheng, J., Ten Eyck, L. F., Ashford, V. A., Xuong, N.-H., Taylor, S. S., & Sowadski, J. M. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1862342 · Cited by 1,759
Proteins. Structures and molecular properties
(1984) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(84)90583-9 · Cited by 1,301
Pai, E. F., Krengel, U., Petsko, G. A., Goody, R. S., Kabsch, W., & Wittinghofer, A. (1990) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07409.x · Cited by 1,074
Cited by
Genome-Wide Analysis of NBS-LRR–Encoding Genes in Arabidopsis[W]
Meyers, B. C., Kozik, A., Griego, A., Kuang, H., & Michelmore, R. W. (2003) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.009308 · Cited by 1,605
Structure of the Arabidopsis RPM1 Gene Enabling Dual Specificity Disease Resistance
Grant, M. R., Godiard, L., Straube, E., Ashfield, T., Lewald, J., Sattler, A., Innes, R. W., & Dangl, J. L. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7638602 · Cited by 910
Signaling in Plant-Microbe Interactions
Baker, B., Zambryski, P., Staskawicz, B., & Dinesh-Kumar, S. P. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5313.726 · Cited by 831
Milligan, S. B., Bodeau, J., Yaghoobi, J., Kaloshian, I., Zabel, P., & Williamson, V. M. (1998) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.10.8.1307 · Cited by 803
van der Biezen, E. A., & Jones, J. D. G. (1998) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70145-9 · Cited by 584
Metadata
- Authors
- TRAUT, T. W.
- Venue
- European Journal of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 222
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-19
- ISSN
- 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1033
- OpenAlex
- W2050821290
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 7.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The functions and consensus motifs of nine types of peptide segments that form different types of nucleotide‐binding sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18835.x
- The paper
- TRAUT, T. W. (1994). The functions and consensus motifs of nine types of peptide segments that form different types of nucleotide‐binding sites. European Journal of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18835.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.