Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biochemical and Antibacterial Analysis of Human Wound and Blister Fluid

Open access
Frohm, Margareta, Gunne, Hans, Bergman, Ann‐Charlotte, Agerberth, Birgitta, Bergman, Tomas, Boman, Anita, Lidén, Sture, Jörnvall, Hans, Boman, Hans G.·1996·European Journal of Biochemistry

Abstract

Fluid from a post‐operative wound, six leg ulcers and a large blister were collected and analysed by biochemical, microbiological and immunological techniques. The results were compared with those from sera. All samples were lyophilized and extracted twice with 60% aqueous acetonitrile containing 1% trifluoroacetic acid. The pooled supernatants were lyophilized, redissolved, and the fluid extracts were characterized by six techniques (the blister exudate only with three): reverse‐phase HPLC, Edman degradation, mass spectrometry, Western blot analysis, inhibition zone assay on plates with Bacillus megaterium (anti‐Bm activity) and zone clearing on plates with cell walls from Micrococcus luteus (a lysozyme assay). The material corresponding to HPLC peaks of the wound fluid extract was identified as: histone H2B fragments 1–11,1 – 15 and 1 – 16, intact thymosin β‐4, defensins HNP1, 2 and 3, lysozyme and the peptide antibiotic FALL‐39 and its precursor(s). The HPLC‐separated blister fluid was extremely rich in anti‐Bm activity (mainly defensins) and lysozyme. It may also contain factors not identified before. The plate assays scored 50‐fold differences in anti‐Bm activities and more than 10‐fold differences in lysozyme, factors which together with thymosin could be active in wound healing. It is concluded that analysis of wound fluid yields peptide and activity patterns with novel fragments of important peptides, and quantitative differences, that can be useful to understand molecular mechanisms of wound healing further.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0086n.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 212

Metadata

Authors
Frohm, M., Gunne, H., Bergman, A., Agerberth, B., Bergman, T., Boman, A., Lidén, S., Jörnvall, H., & Boman, H. G.
Venue
European Journal of Biochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-04
Volume
237
Issue
1
Pages
86-92
ISSN
  • 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1033
OpenAlex
W2037955254
Cited by
212
References
0
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biochemical and Antibacterial Analysis of Human Wound and Blister Fluid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0086n.x
The paper
Frohm, M., Gunne, H., Bergman, A., Agerberth, B., Bergman, T., Boman, A., Lidén, S., Jörnvall, H., & Boman, H. G. (1996). Biochemical and Antibacterial Analysis of Human Wound and Blister Fluid. European Journal of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0086n.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.