The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biochemical and Antibacterial Analysis of Human Wound and Blister Fluid
Open accessAbstract
Fluid from a post‐operative wound, six leg ulcers and a large blister were collected and analysed by biochemical, microbiological and immunological techniques. The results were compared with those from sera. All samples were lyophilized and extracted twice with 60% aqueous acetonitrile containing 1% trifluoroacetic acid. The pooled supernatants were lyophilized, redissolved, and the fluid extracts were characterized by six techniques (the blister exudate only with three): reverse‐phase HPLC, Edman degradation, mass spectrometry, Western blot analysis, inhibition zone assay on plates with Bacillus megaterium (anti‐Bm activity) and zone clearing on plates with cell walls from Micrococcus luteus (a lysozyme assay). The material corresponding to HPLC peaks of the wound fluid extract was identified as: histone H2B fragments 1–11,1 – 15 and 1 – 16, intact thymosin β‐4, defensins HNP1, 2 and 3, lysozyme and the peptide antibiotic FALL‐39 and its precursor(s). The HPLC‐separated blister fluid was extremely rich in anti‐Bm activity (mainly defensins) and lysozyme. It may also contain factors not identified before. The plate assays scored 50‐fold differences in anti‐Bm activities and more than 10‐fold differences in lysozyme, factors which together with thymosin could be active in wound healing. It is concluded that analysis of wound fluid yields peptide and activity patterns with novel fragments of important peptides, and quantitative differences, that can be useful to understand molecular mechanisms of wound healing further.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Amphipathic, α-helical antimicrobial peptides
Tossi, A., Sandri, L., & Giangaspero, A. (2000) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/1097-0282(2000)55:1<4::aid-bip30>3.0.co;2-m · Cited by 1,247
LL-37, the only human member of the cathelicidin family of antimicrobial peptides
Dürr, U. H. N., Sudheendra, U. S., & Ramamoorthy, A. (2006) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.03.030 · Cited by 1,049
Cathelicidins, multifunctional peptides of the innate immunity
Zanetti, M. (2004) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0403147 · Cited by 988
Frohm, M., Agerberth, B., Ahangari, G., Ståhle-Bäckdahl, M., Lidén, S., Wigzell, H., & Gudmundsson, G. H. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.24.15258 · Cited by 803
Self-citationBock-Marquette, I., Saxena, A., White, M. D., Michael DiMaio, J., & Srivastava, D. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03000 · Cited by 657
Metadata
- Authors
- Frohm, M., Gunne, H., Bergman, A., Agerberth, B., Bergman, T., Boman, A., Lidén, S., Jörnvall, H., & Boman, H. G.
- Venue
- European Journal of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 237
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-92
- ISSN
- 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1033
- OpenAlex
- W2037955254
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biochemical and Antibacterial Analysis of Human Wound and Blister Fluid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0086n.x
- The paper
- Frohm, M., Gunne, H., Bergman, A., Agerberth, B., Bergman, T., Boman, A., Lidén, S., Jörnvall, H., & Boman, H. G. (1996). Biochemical and Antibacterial Analysis of Human Wound and Blister Fluid. European Journal of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0086n.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.