The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MYB72, a node of convergence in induced systemic resistance triggered by a fungal and a bacterial beneficial microbe
Open accessAbstract
Colonisation of plant roots by selected beneficial Trichoderma fungi or Pseudomonas bacteria can result in the activation of a systemic defence response that is effective against a broad spectrum of pathogens. In Arabidopsis thaliana, induced systemic resistance (ISR) triggered by the rhizobacterial strain Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS417r is regulated by a jasmonic acid‐ and ethylene‐dependent defence signalling pathway. Jasmonic acid and ethylene also play a role in Trichoderma‐induced resistance. To further investigate the similarities between rhizobacteria‐ and Trichoderma‐induced resistance, we studied the response of Arabidopsis to root colonisation by Trichoderma asperellum T34. In many aspects T34‐ISR was similar to WCS417r‐ISR. First, colonisation of the roots by T34 rendered the leaves more resistant to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, the biotrophic oomycete Hyaloperonospora parasitica and the necrotrophic fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina. Second, treatment of the roots with T34 primed the leaf tissue for enhanced jasmonic acid‐responsive gene expression and increased formation of callose‐containing papillae upon pathogen attack. Third, T34‐ISR was fully expressed in the salicylic acid impaired mutant sid2, but blocked in the defence regulatory mutant npr1. Finally, we show that the root‐specific transcription factor MYB72, which is essential in early signalling steps of WCS417r‐ISR, is also required for T34‐ISR. Together, these results indicate that the defence pathways triggered by beneficial Trichoderma and Pseudomonas spp. strains are highly similar and that MYB72 functions as an early node of convergence in the signalling pathways that are induced by these different beneficial microorganisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 · Cited by 5,347
Self-citationMYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis
Dubos, C., Stracke, R., Grotewold, E., Weisshaar, B., Martin, C., & Lepiniec, L. (2010) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.005 · Cited by 4,865
Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes
Pieterse, C. M. J., Zamioudis, C., Berendsen, R. L., Weller, D. M., Van Wees, S. C. M., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2014) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340 · Cited by 3,272
Self-citationAzospirillum: benefits that go far beyond biological nitrogen fixation
Fukami, J., Cerezini, P., & Hungria, M. (2018) · AMB Express · doi:10.1186/s13568-018-0608-1 · Cited by 624
Jasmonate signaling in plant interactions with resistance-inducing beneficial microbes
Van der Ent, S., Van Wees, S. C. M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2009) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.06.009 · Cited by 443
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Segarra, G., Van der Ent, S., Trillas, I., & Pieterse, C. M. J.
- Venue
- Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-96
- ISSN
- 1435-8603 (ISSN-L)
- 1438-8677
- OpenAlex
- W2145630072
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MYB72, a node of convergence in induced systemic resistance triggered by a fungal and a bacterial beneficial microbe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00162.x
- The paper
- Segarra, G., Van der Ent, S., Trillas, I., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2009). MYB72, a node of convergence in induced systemic resistance triggered by a fungal and a bacterial beneficial microbe. Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00162.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.