Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is Human Handedness Universal? Ethological Analyses from Three Traditional Cultures

Marchant, Linda F., McGrew, William C., Eibl‐Eibesfeldt, Irenäus·1995·Ethology

Abstract

Right‐handedness in Homo sapiens is claimed to be qualitatively different from that of other primates, at species level, and to be universal across all cultures. Ethnographic indicators are sparse, however, being mostly indirect rather than direct observations of selected motor patterns. Ethological study of hand use, i.e. observation of a wide range of everyday behavioural patterns performed spontaneously, is missing. We coded such manual activity from cinematic archives of three traditional societies: G/wi San of Botswana, Himba of Namibia and Yanomamö of Venezuela. Results showed a consistent but weak right‐hand dominance across these three preliterate cultures. Most individuals showed mixed‐, rather than right‐handedness, irrespective of whether or not object manipulation was involved. The notable exception was tool use, which was markedly right‐handed, and only precision‐gripping tool use was normally performed exclusively with the right hand. Most questionnaires that measure handedness focus on precision tool use (and so are likely to be biased accordingly) rather than on more comprehensive ethological measures that include non‐object‐manipulatory, self‐directed and socially communicative patterns of behaviour.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1995.tb00362.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Marchant, L. F., McGrew, W. C., & Eibl‐Eibesfeldt, I.
Venue
Ethology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-01-12
Volume
101
Issue
3
Pages
239-258
ISSN
  • 0179-1613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0310
OpenAlex
W1981812131
Cited by
166
References
1
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Human Handedness Universal? Ethological Analyses from Three Traditional Cultures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1995.tb00362.x
The paper
Marchant, L. F., McGrew, W. C., & Eibl‐Eibesfeldt, I. (1995). Is Human Handedness Universal? Ethological Analyses from Three Traditional Cultures. Ethology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1995.tb00362.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.