The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Does Weather or Site Characteristics Influence the Ability of Scavengers to Locate Food?
Abstract
Olfactory predators and scavengers rely on odors to locate food, and they forage primarily at night. We hypothesized that weather (e.g. wind speed, humidity, and temperature), vegetation, and landscape features affect the dissipation of odors in the atmosphere and, thus, impact the foraging efficiency of olfactory predators. We tested this hypothesis by assessing what conditions were correlated with the persistence of bait along the dike surrounding Willard Bay Reservoir, Utah. We distributed 124 chicken eggs and 199 dead European starlings ( Sturnus vulgaris ) as bait over 21 separate occasions spanning from May 21, 2009, to August 18, 2009. We used timers to record the time of consumption and cameras to identify which species ate the bait. Sixty‐six eggs and 87 dead European starlings were consumed. The bait was consumed mostly at night (83%) and by striped skunks ( Mephitis mephitis ), raccoons ( Procyon lotor ), and red foxes ( Vulpes vulpes ). We used nest survival models in program MARK to determine which covariates influenced bait persistence. We tested nine variables and found that bait persistence was influenced by section of the dike, time since study initiation, temperature, humidity, and wind speed but not bait type (egg or dead European starling), terrain, or visual cover. How quickly scavengers were able to locate food, which was inversely related to rates of bait persistence, decreased with higher temperatures and wind speeds and increased with higher humidity. Our results support the hypothesis that weather and micro‐habitat characteristics impact the ability of olfactory predators and scavengers to locate food.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“certain vegetation impairs visibility of the remains, decreasing activity of visually-oriented scavengers [53,88,124].”
From Forensic experiments on animal scavenging: A systematic literature review on what we have and what we need (2023) · cites this paper as [124]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.2307/2423922 · DOI
- Borgo J. S., 2009, A device to record the specific time an artificial nest is depredated, Human–Wildl. Conflicts, 3, 88
- 10.2307/1370078 · DOI
- 10.1177/0049124104268644 · DOI · Paper page
- Clark R. G., 1991, Habitat patch size and duck nesting success: the crucial experiments have not been performed, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 19, 534
- 10.1201/9781420009125 · DOI
- 10.1525/cond.2010.090172 · DOI
- 10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[1111:HUBMIA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01098.x · DOI
- Gutzwiller K. J., 1990, Minimizing dog‐induced biases in game bird research, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 18, 351
- Homan J. H., 2001, Dogs increase recovery of passerine carcasses in dense vegetation, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 29, 292
- Jimenez J. E., 2001, Ecological approaches to reduce predation on ground‐nesting gamebirds and their nests, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 29, 62
- 10.1648/0273-8570-72.3.439 · DOI · Paper page
- Linz G. M., 1991, Estimating survival of bird carcasses in cattail marshes, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 19, 195
- Linz G. M., 1997, Estimating survival of song bird carcasses in crops and woodlots, Prairie Naturalist, 29, 7
- 10.2307/2426462 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853991X00472 · DOI
- 10.1007/s004420050179 · DOI
- 10.2307/3546801 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indra, L., Lösch, S., Errickson, D., & Finaughty, D. (2023) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111862 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruzicka, R. E., & Conover, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Utah State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Conover, Michael R.
- Venue
- Ethology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12-15
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-196
- ISSN
- 0179-1613 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0310
- OpenAlex
- W1493726870
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ethology (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Keywords
- scavengers, weather effects on foraging, wind speed, humidity, temperature, nocturnal feeding, striped skunks, raccoons, red fox, Sturnus vulgaris, nest survival, microhabitat
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review