Cited by 53Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesAvian ecology and behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Does Weather or Site Characteristics Influence the Ability of Scavengers to Locate Food?

Abstract

Olfactory predators and scavengers rely on odors to locate food, and they forage primarily at night. We hypothesized that weather (e.g. wind speed, humidity, and temperature), vegetation, and landscape features affect the dissipation of odors in the atmosphere and, thus, impact the foraging efficiency of olfactory predators. We tested this hypothesis by assessing what conditions were correlated with the persistence of bait along the dike surrounding Willard Bay Reservoir, Utah. We distributed 124 chicken eggs and 199 dead European starlings ( Sturnus vulgaris ) as bait over 21 separate occasions spanning from May 21, 2009, to August 18, 2009. We used timers to record the time of consumption and cameras to identify which species ate the bait. Sixty‐six eggs and 87 dead European starlings were consumed. The bait was consumed mostly at night (83%) and by striped skunks ( Mephitis mephitis ), raccoons ( Procyon lotor ), and red foxes ( Vulpes vulpes ). We used nest survival models in program MARK to determine which covariates influenced bait persistence. We tested nine variables and found that bait persistence was influenced by section of the dike, time since study initiation, temperature, humidity, and wind speed but not bait type (egg or dead European starling), terrain, or visual cover. How quickly scavengers were able to locate food, which was inversely related to rates of bait persistence, decreased with higher temperatures and wind speeds and increased with higher humidity. Our results support the hypothesis that weather and micro‐habitat characteristics impact the ability of olfactory predators and scavengers to locate food.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01997.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.2307/2423922 · DOI
  2. Borgo J. S., 2009, A device to record the specific time an artificial nest is depredated, Human–Wildl. Conflicts, 3, 88
  3. 10.2307/1370078 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/0049124104268644 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Clark R. G., 1991, Habitat patch size and duck nesting success: the crucial experiments have not been performed, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 19, 534
  6. 10.1201/9781420009125 · DOI
  7. 10.1525/cond.2010.090172 · DOI
  8. 10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[1111:HUBMIA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01098.x · DOI
  10. Gutzwiller K. J., 1990, Minimizing dog‐induced biases in game bird research, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 18, 351
  11. Homan J. H., 2001, Dogs increase recovery of passerine carcasses in dense vegetation, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 29, 292
  12. Jimenez J. E., 2001, Ecological approaches to reduce predation on ground‐nesting gamebirds and their nests, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 29, 62
  13. 10.1648/0273-8570-72.3.439 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Linz G. M., 1991, Estimating survival of bird carcasses in cattail marshes, Wildl. Soc. Bull., 19, 195
  15. Linz G. M., 1997, Estimating survival of song bird carcasses in crops and woodlots, Prairie Naturalist, 29, 7
  16. 10.2307/2426462 · DOI
  17. 10.1163/156853991X00472 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s004420050179 · DOI
  19. 10.2307/3546801 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ruzicka, R. E., & Conover, M. R.
Affiliations
Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Conover, Michael R.
Venue
Ethology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-15
Volume
118
Issue
2
Pages
187-196
ISSN
  • 0179-1613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0310
OpenAlex
W1493726870
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ethology (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
scavengers, weather effects on foraging, wind speed, humidity, temperature, nocturnal feeding, striped skunks, raccoons, red fox, Sturnus vulgaris, nest survival, microhabitat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review