Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in Foxes: Evaluation of a Protocol of the Intestinal Scraping Technique
Open accessAbstract
The intestinal scraping technique (IST) is widely used for the detection of definitive hosts infected with Echinococcus multilocularis. The sensitivity of the method has been questioned in recent years. Several variations of the technique are used that may differ in their performance. We therefore estimated the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the IST protocol used in our lab by examining the small intestines of 210 E. multilocularis-infected foxes and 294 foxes that had tested negative for this parasite. To this end, IST was first performed on 48 and 294 intestines from infected and uninfected foxes respectively, followed by an examination of the entire remaining mucosa of the small intestine to discover any infections with E. multilocularis that had not been detected by IST. The point estimate for diagnostic sensitivity was 100%. Five different classes of infection intensities were formed. The lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals ranged between 76.8% and 92.6% depending on the number of samples analysed per class. When the small intestines of another 162 infected foxes were examined by IST and the results recorded separately for the anterior, middle and posterior third of the small intestine, a strong preference of E. multilocularis for the posterior third was observed. For epidemiological purposes, it may thus be possible to restrict routine investigations to the posterior portion of the small intestine. By contrast, a reduction of the number of slides exa…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The posterior part of the small intestine is considered a predilection site for E. multilocularis.
“The posterior part of the small intestine is considered a predilection site for E. multilocularis [28,29,32].”
From Distribution of Parasitic Helminths in the Small Intestine of the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) (2020) · cites this paper as [28]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Distribution of Parasitic Helminths in the Small Intestine of the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes)
Karamon, J., Sroka, J., Dąbrowska, J., Bilska-Zając, E., Skrzypek, K., Różycki, M., Zdybel, J., & Cencek, T. (2020) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens9060477 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“multilocularis, which is associated with the development of diagnostic methods used in monitoring studies [28,29].”
Method
- Authors
- Tackmann, K., Mattis, R., & Conraths, F. J.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Conraths, F. J.
- ORCID
- Conraths, F. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series B
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09-28
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 395-398
- ISSN
- 0931-1793 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047296526
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Parasitic infections in humans and animals
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- Echinococcus multilocularis, alveolar echinococcosis, foxes, diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity, small intestine, infection intensity, definitive host, parasite detection
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Echinococcosis, Foxes, Intestine, Small, Sensitivity and Specificity, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures, Echinococcus multilocularis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review