Convergent evolution and paraphyly of the hawk-eagles of the genus Spizaetus (Aves, Accipitridae) – phylogenetic analyses based on mitochondrial markers
Abstract
The phylogenetic relationships within the New and Old World hawk-eagle assemblage (genus Spizaetus; Aves: Accipitridae) were studied using mitochondrial DNA sequences (cytochrome b, control region). Eighty-four specimens representing all Spizaetus species and almost all currently distinguished subspecies as well as 11 other booted and non-booted eagle genera from the Neotropics, Africa, Eurasia, South Asia and Australasia (Oroaetus, Harpia, Morphnus, Lophaetus, Stephanoaetus, Hieraaetus, Aquila, Ictinaetus, Spilornis, Pithecophaga, Harpyopsis) were investigated. Although the basal branching could not be resolved, our investigations clearly indicate that hawk-eagles represent a paraphyletic assemblage and thus their external similarities have to be ascribed to convergent evolution. The New World taxa of Spizaetus cluster together, but the South American species Oroaetus isidori appears embedded within this clade. The taxa from Southeast to East Asia form a clearly separated monophyletic group. It is further divided into two subgroups, which are also characterized by distinct juvenile plumage patterns. Spizaetus africanus, the only African representative of the genus, is found in a mixed cluster consisting of members of the genera Aquila and Hieraaetus. These findings are in accordance with previous studies of other authors based on various molecular markers and different sets of taxa, but disagree with current taxonomy. Therefore, we suggest assigning the species of the genus…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
We recovered a clade containing ten lineages corresponding to genera traditionally classified in Aquilinae.
“We recovered a clade containing ten lineages corresponding to genera traditionally classified in the subfamily Aquilinae (Stephanoaetus, Nisaetus, Lophotriorchis, Polemaetus, Spizaetus [including S. isidori (Des Murs, 1845), formerly in the monotypic genus Oroaetus; see Haring et al., 2007], Ictinaetus, Lophaetus, Clanga, Aquila [including A. africanus (Cassin, 1865), formerly in Spizaetus; see H”
From Enigmas no longer: using ultraconserved elements to place several unusual hawk taxa and address the non-monophyly of the genus <i>Accipiter</i> (Accipitriformes: Accipitridae) (2025) · cites this paper as Haring et al., 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mindell, D. P., Fuchs, J., & Johnson, J. A. (2018) · Birds of Prey · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73745-4_1 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Catanach, T. A., Halley, M. R., & Pirro, S. (2025) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blae028 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
DNA barcodes of Philippine accipitrids
ONG, P. S., LUCZON, A. U., QUILANG, J. P., SUMAYA, A. M. T., IBAÑEZ, J. C., SALVADOR, D. J., & FONTANILLA, I. K. C. (2011) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02928.x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Haring, E., Kvaløy, K., Gjershaug, J.-O., Røv, N., & Gamauf, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 353-365
- ISSN
- 0947-5745 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0469
- OpenAlex
- W2153505975
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Zoological Systematics & Evolutionary Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Norges Forskningsråd
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Keywords
- Accipitridae, convergent evolution, paraphyly, phylogenetic relationships, mitochondrial DNA, cytochrome b, control region, Aquila
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review