The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pigment dynamics and autumn leaf senescence in a New England deciduous forest, eastern USA
Abstract
The leaves of woody plants at Harvard Forest in Central Massachusetts, USA, changed color during senescence; 70% (62/89) of the woody species examined anatomically contained anthocyanins during senescence. Anthocyanins were not present in summer green leaves, and appeared primarily in the vacuoles of palisade parenchyma cells. Yellow coloration was a result of the unmasking of xanthophyll pigments in senescing chloroplasts. In nine red‐senescing species, anthocyanins were not detectable in mature leaves, and were synthesized de novo in senescence, with less than 20 µg cm −2 of chlorophyll remaining. Xanthophyll concentrations declined in relation to chlorophyll to the same extent in both yellow‐ and red‐leaved taxa. Declines in the maximum photosystem II quantum yield of leaves collected prior to dawn were only slightly less in the red‐senescing species, indicating no long‐term protective activity. Red‐leaved species had significantly greater mass/area and lower chlorophyll a / b ratios during senescence. Nitrogen tissue concentrations in mature and senescent leaves negatively correlated to anthocyanin concentrations in senescent leaves, weak evidence for more efficient nitrogen resorption in anthocyanic species. Shading retarded both chlorophyll loss and anthocyanin production in Cornus alternifolia , Acer rubrum , Acer saccharum , Quercus rubra and Viburnum alnifolium . It promoted chlorophyll loss in yellow‐senescing Fagus grandifolia . A reduced red : far‐red ratio did not affect this process. Anthocyanins did not increase leaf temperatures in Q. rubra and Vaccinium corymbosum on cold and sunny days. The timing of leaf‐fall was remarkably constant from year to year, and the order of senescence of individual species was consistent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matile, P., Hörtensteiner, S., & Thomas, H. (1999) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.67 · Cited by 515
Cited by
Diagnosis of abiotic and biotic stress factors using the visible symptoms in foliage
Vollenweider, P., & Günthardt-Goerg, M. S. (2005) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.01.032 · Cited by 334
Gill, A. L., Gallinat, A. S., Sanders-DeMott, R., Rigden, A. J., Short Gianotti, D. J., Mantooth, J. A., & Templer, P. H. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcv055 · Cited by 328
Vitasse, Y., Porté, A. J., Kremer, A., Michalet, R., & Delzon, S. (2009) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-009-1363-4 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, D. W., O'Keefe, J., Holbrook, N. M., & Feild, T. S.
- Venue
- Ecological Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 677-694
- ISSN
- 0912-3814 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1703
- OpenAlex
- W2166025610
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pigment dynamics and autumn leaf senescence in a New England deciduous forest, eastern USA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1440-1703.2003.00588.x
- The paper
- Lee, D. W., O'Keefe, J., Holbrook, N. M., & Feild, T. S. (2003). Pigment dynamics and autumn leaf senescence in a New England deciduous forest, eastern USA. Ecological Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1703.2003.00588.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.