Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Four modifiable and other major risk factors for cot death: The New Zealand study

MITCHELL, E. A., TAYLOR, B. J., FORD, R. P. K., STEWART, A. W., BECROFT, D. M. O., THOMPSON, J. M. D., SCRAGG, R., HASSALL, I. B., BARRY, D. M. J., ALLEN, E. M., ROBERTS, A. P.·1992·Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health

Abstract

Abstract New Zealand's high mortality rate from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) prompted the development of the New Zealand Cot Death Study. A report of the analysis of the data from the first year has been published. This report now gives the major identified risk factors from the full 3 year data set. In this case‐control study there were 485 infants who died from SIDS in the post‐neonatal age group, and 1800 control infants, who were a representative sample of all hospital births in the study region. Obstetric records were examined and parental interviews were completed in 97.5% and 86.9% of subjects, respectively. As expected many risk factors for SIDS were confirmed including: lower socio‐economic status, unmarried mother, young mother, younger school‐leaving age of mother, younger age of mother at first pregnancy, late attendance at antenatal clinic, non‐attendance at antenatal classes, Maori, greater number of previous pregnancies, the further south the domicile, winter, low birthweight, short gestation, male infant and admission to a special care baby unit. In addition, however, we identified four risk factors that are potentially amenable to modification. These were the prone sleeping position of the baby (odds ratio (OR) = 3.70; 95% confidence interval (Cl) = 2.91, 4.70); bed sharing (OR = 2.70; 95% Cl = 2.02, 3.62); maternal smoking of 1–9 cigarettes per day (OR = 3.47; 95% Cl = 2.50, 4.83), 10–19 cigarettes per day (OR = 3.94; 95% Cl = 2.87, 5.41) or more than 20 cigarettes per day (OR = 5.90; 95% Cl = 4.20, 8.31); and not breast feeding (OR = 2.39; 95% Cl = 1.88, 3.04). After controlling for all of the above variables, the relative risks associated with prone sleeping position (OR = 4.84). sharing bed (OR = 2.02), maternal smoking (OR = 1.79) and not breast feeding (OR = 1.89) were still statistically significant. Population‐attributable risk calculations suggest that these four risk factors may account for 82% of deaths from SIDS. The SIDS mortality rate may fall to less than 0.7/1000 live births if all parents stop putting their infants down to sleep in the prone position, do not sleep with their baby, do not smoke, and breast feed their infants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1992.tb02729.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
MITCHELL, E. A., TAYLOR, B. J., FORD, R. P. K., STEWART, A. W., BECROFT, D. M. O., THOMPSON, J. M. D., SCRAGG, R., HASSALL, I. B., BARRY, D. M. J., ALLEN, E. M., & ROBERTS, A. P.
Venue
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-08
Volume
28
Issue
s1
Pages
S3-8
ISSN
  • 1034-4810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1754
OpenAlex
W2123382213
Cited by
297
References
0
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Four modifiable and other major risk factors for cot death: The New Zealand study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1440-1754.1992.tb02729.x
The paper
MITCHELL, E. A., TAYLOR, B. J., FORD, R. P. K., STEWART, A. W., BECROFT, D. M. O., THOMPSON, J. M. D., SCRAGG, R., HASSALL, I. B., BARRY, D. M. J., ALLEN, E. M., & ROBERTS, A. P. (1992). Four modifiable and other major risk factors for cot death: The New Zealand study. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.1992.tb02729.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.