Predictors of dropout among personality disorders in a specialist outpatients psychosocial treatment: A preliminary study
Open accessAbstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to identify factors that may affect treatment retention in a 1‐year psychosocial program for adult personality disorders. Methods: The sample consists of patients admitted to the Adult Personality Disorder Outpatient Programme of the Bologna Community Mental Health Centre in the period 2003–2008. At the beginning of the program, patients were evaluated through a comprehensive assessment including sociodemographic form, diagnostic interviews and self‐report questionnaires. Patients who dropped out from treatment were retrospectively compared with patients who completed the program. Results: Out of 39 patients enrolled in the program, 20 (51.3%) dropped out and 19 (48.7%) completed the treatment. Out of 20 patients who dropped out, 14 terminated the treatment within the first 2 months. The dropout group and the group which remained showed significant differences in diagnosis (borderline personality disorder [BPD]), demographic data (age, time from first contact with psychiatric services), clinical variable (impulsiveness) and subjective experience (motivation, treatment expectation, therapeutic relation perception and barriers to access). BPD and subjective evaluation were found to be predictors of premature termination in the sample. In detail, BPD patients who experienced a less satisfactory therapeutic relationship and reported many external problems were more likely to drop out of the program. Conclusion: Important factors contributing to dropout were identified, with potential implication for clinical practice. Further efforts need to be made to find ways to retain BPD patients who find the first subjective experience of the service more problematic.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Personality disorders are one of the main predictive factors of dropout.
“Personality disorders are one of the main predictive factors of dropout [17].”
From Determinants of dropout in a community-based mental health crisis centre (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
The Abstract and Results (paper pp. 180–186) identify borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis as associated with dropout among patients already diagnosed with a personality disorder. They do not establish that personality disorders generally predict dropout compared with having no personality disorder; the claim broadens a finding about BPD within this sample. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDropping out of treatment is associated with time from first contact.
“Other studies found an association between dropping out of treatment and time from first contact [17], low income and the lack of insurance coverage [4], living alone, and low socioeconomic status [20].”
From Determinants of dropout in a community-based mental health crisis centre (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 72
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Blount C, King J, Menzies D. Experiences of joining and leaving a therapeutic community and how preparation may help reduce drop-out. Therap. Commun. 2002; 23: 271-284.
- Patton J, Stanford M, Barratt E. Barratt impulsiveness scale, version 11 [BIS 11]. In: Schutte N, Malouff J (eds). Sour- cebook of Adult Assessment. Plenum Press, New York, 1995; 361-364.
- Authors
- Martino, F., Menchetti, M., Pozzi, E., & Berardi, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Bologna (IT)
- Venue
- Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-23
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 180-186
- ISSN
- 1323-1316 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1819
- OpenAlex
- W1583640334
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- treatment discontinuation, personality disorders, borderline personality disorder, treatment retention, psychosocial interventions, outpatient care, therapeutic relationship, impulsivity, access barriers, treatment motivation, treatment expectations
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aggression, Ambulatory Care, Community Mental Health Centers, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Outpatients, Patient Compliance, Patient Dropouts, Personality Disorders, Predictive Value of Tests, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Group, Social Behavior, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Confidence Intervals, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review