The DOI matches its Crossref record.
COPD in Japan: the Nippon COPD Epidemiology study
Abstract
Objectives: Despite high smoking rates, few prevalence studies of COPD have been performed in Asia. The Nippon COPD Epidemiology (NICE) Study used spirometry to measure prevalence of airflow limitation in Japanese adults. Methodology: Clinical, spirometric, and risk factor exposure data were collected on 2343 subjects aged ≥ 40 years who were demographically similar to the Japanese population. Airflow limitation was defined according to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria (FEV 1/FVC < 70%). Results: Prevalence of airflow limitation was 10.9%. Based upon GOLD severity criteria, 56% of these cases were found to be mild, 38% moderate, 5% severe, and 1% very severe. Airflow limitation was significantly more prevalent in males than females (16.4% vs. 5.0%; P < 0.001), in male ever‐smokers than female ever‐smokers (17.1% vs. 7.5%; P < 0.001), and in older subjects (3.5% in 40–49 years olds vs. 24.4% in those > 70 years; P < 0.001). Of note, airflow limitation was also found in 5.8% of non‐smokers and 4.6% of those younger than age 60 years. Only 9.4% of cases with airflow limitation reported a previous diagnosis of COPD. Conclusions: Prevalence of airflow limitation in Japan is higher than previously reported, suggesting a high degree of under‐recognition of COPD. The high prevalence of smoking coupled with an aging population threatens to further increase the burden of COPD, highlighting the need for enhanced screening efforts and interventions of prevention and treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vestbo, J., Hurd, S. S., Agustí, A. G., Jones, P. W., Vogelmeier, C., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Martinez, F. J., Nishimura, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0596pp · Cited by 15,983
Self-citationRabe, K. F., Hurd, S., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Buist, S. A., Calverley, P., Fukuchi, Y., Jenkins, C., Rodriguez-Roisin, R., van Weel, C., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200703-456so · Cited by 4,925
Self-citationInoue, Y., Trapnell, B. C., Tazawa, R., Arai, T., Takada, T., Hizawa, N., Kasahara, Y., Tatsumi, K., Hojo, M., Ichiwata, T., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200708-1271oc · Cited by 490
Update on Bispectral Index monitoring
Johansen, J. W. (2006) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2005.08.004 · Cited by 313
Lim, S., Lam, D. C.-L., Muttalif, A. R., Yunus, F., Wongtim, S., Lan, L. T. T., Shetty, V., Chu, R., Zheng, J., Perng, D.-W., et al. (2015) · Asia Pacific Family Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12930-015-0020-9 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- FUKUCHI, Y., NISHIMURA, M., ICHINOSE, M., ADACHI, M., NAGAI, A., KURIYAMA, T., TAKAHASHI, K., NISHIMURA, K., ISHIOKA, S., AIZAWA, H., & ZAHER, C.
- Venue
- Respirology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 458-465
- ISSN
- 1323-7799 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1843
- OpenAlex
- W2119767177
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COPD in Japan: the Nippon COPD Epidemiology study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2004.00637.x
- The paper
- FUKUCHI, Y., NISHIMURA, M., ICHINOSE, M., ADACHI, M., NAGAI, A., KURIYAMA, T., TAKAHASHI, K., NISHIMURA, K., ISHIOKA, S., AIZAWA, H., & ZAHER, C. (2004). COPD in Japan: the Nippon COPD Epidemiology study. Respirology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2004.00637.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.