Cited by 99Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseasesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Self‐management plans in the primary care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

McGEOCH, Graham R. B., WILLSMAN, Karen J., DOWSON, Claire A., TOWN, George I., FRAMPTON, Christopher M., McCARTIN, Fiona J., COOK, Julie M., EPTON, Michael J.·2006·Respirology

Abstract

Objective and background: The role of COPD self‐management plans in improving health outcomes remains unclear. The objective of this study was to assess whether self‐management plans administered in primary care have beneficial effects on quality of life, self‐care behaviour and health outcomes in the long term for patients with COPD. Material, patients and methods: The study was a prospective, unblinded, randomized controlled trial of usual care vs. usual care plus structured education on the use of a written self‐management plan and patient‐initiated short courses of antibiotics and oral corticosteroids. The study was conducted in general practice, in Christchurch, New Zealand. Participants were 159 patients with COPD randomized by general practice site into control or intervention groups. The primary outcome measure was change in St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire. Secondary variables were frequency of hospital and primary‐care attendance, frequency of use of courses of antibiotics and oral corticosteroids over 12 months, and change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Self‐management knowledge was assessed using a structured interview, the COPD Self‐Management Interview. Results: Self‐management plans and structured education were associated with higher levels of self‐management knowledge at 12 months, but had no effect on change in St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, health utilization, mental health or self‐reported outcomes of patients with COPD managed in general practice. Conclusions: Self‐management knowledge was higher in the intervention group but there was no difference in quality of life or health outcomes due to self‐management plans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00892.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGEOCH, G. R. B., WILLSMAN, K. J., DOWSON, C. A., TOWN, G. I., FRAMPTON, C. M., McCARTIN, F. J., COOK, J. M., & EPTON, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
EPTON, Michael J.
Venue
Respirology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-08-03
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
611-618
ISSN
  • 1323-7799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1843
OpenAlex
W1973905911
Cited by
99
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Respirology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, self-management plans, patient education, primary care, quality of life, self-care behavior, antibiotic use, oral corticosteroids, hospital visits, anxiety and depression, self-management knowledge
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Prednisone, Self Care, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review