Cited by 38Sperm and Testicular FunctionMale Reproductive Health StudiesReproductive Health and Technologies

Is varicocelectomy indicated in subfertile men with clinical varicoceles who have asthenospermia or teratospermia and normal sperm density?

Okeke, Linus, Ikuerowo, Odunayo, Chiekwe, Ifeanyi, Etukakpan, Blessing, Shittu, Olayiwola, Olapade‐Olaopa, Olubunmi·2007·International Journal of Urology

Abstract

Objective: Varicocele is the most common treatable cause of male infertility and is associated with progressive decline in testicular function. Varicocelectomy, a commonly performed operation, is indicated in infertile males with varicoceles who have oligospermia, asthenospermia, teratospermia or a combination of these factors. It is not clear if varicocelectomy is indicated if the patients have normal sperm density associated with asthenospermia or teratospermia. Methods: We reviewed 167 patients with varicocele‐associated male infertility over a 7‐year period (December 1999–November 2005). Pre‐ and post‐varicocelectomy seminal fluid analyses, assessed using the World Health Organization criteria, were obtained at intervals of 4–6 months. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to evaluate for statistical significance and P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean age of the patients and their spouses were 35 and 28 years, respectively. The mean duration of infertility was 3.2 years (range, 1.5–7.5). Oligospermia, teratospermia, asthenospermia, oligospermia, asthenospermia and teratospermia (OAT) syndrome and azoospermia were found preoperatively in 106 (63.5%), 58 (34.7%), 154 (92%), 118 (71%) and 15 (9%) patients, respectively. Overall, significant improvements in semen volume (P < 0.001), sperm density (P < 0.001), sperm motility (P < 0.001) and sperm vitality (P < 0.001) were obtained after varicocelectomy. There was, however, no significant improvement in sperm morphology after varicocelectomy (P = 0.220). When patients with preoperative oligospermia (sperm density, <20 million/mL) were considered separately, varicocelectomy led to significant improvement in all the semen parameters except the sperm morphology (P = 0.183). Conversely, when varicocele patients with a sperm density of ≥20 million/mL (normospermia) associated with asthenospermia and/or teratospermia were considered separately, they did not show significant improvement in any of the semen parameters after varicocelectomy (P > 0.05). In addition, azoospermic patients did not show significant improvement in any of the semen parameters (P > 0.05) Conclusion: No significant improvement in semen parameters may be obtained in patients with clinical varicocele and preoperative normospermia. It is possible that only patients with preoperative oligospermia may benefit from varicocelectomy. Larger multi‐institutional studies are needed to determine more definitively if asthenospermia or teratospermia in normospermic subfertile males with clinical varicoceles are in fact indications for varicocelectomy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01786.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In men with clinical varicocele and pre-operative normal sperm density, varicocelectomy does not significantly improve sperm morphology.

    “However, other studies have reported no significant improvement in sperm morphology after varicocelectomy in men with clinical varicocele and pre-operative normal sperm density (100,101).”
  • Several studies have evaluated the role of varicocelectomy and antioxidants in improving sperm morphology, particularly for immature sperm and those with head and tail defects based on Kruger's classification.

    “Several studies have evaluated the role of varicocelectomy and antioxidants in improving sperm morphology, particularly for immature sperm and those with head and tail defects based on Kruger’s classification (97-104).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Okeke, L., Ikuerowo, O., Chiekwe, I., Etukakpan, B., Shittu, O., & Olapade‐Olaopa, O.
Affiliations
University of Ibadan (NG)
Corresponding author
Okeke, Linus
Venue
International Journal of Urology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-07
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
729-732
ISSN
  • 0919-8172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1442-2042
OpenAlex
W1826236458
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
varicocelectomy, varicocele, male infertility, asthenozoospermia, teratozoospermia, oligozoospermia, sperm motility, sperm viability, sperm morphology, semen parameters, surgical indications, azoospermia
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Oligospermia, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Varicocele, Treatment Failure, Asthenozoospermia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review