Cited by 70Sleep and Work-Related FatigueCircadian rhythm and melatoninProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Industry‐based retrospective cohort study of the risk of prostate cancer among rotating‐shift workers

Kubo, Tatsuhiko, Oyama, Ichiro, Nakamura, Takehiro, Kunimoto, Masamizu, Kadowaki, Koji, Otomo, Hajime, Fujino, Yoshihisa, Fujimoto, Naohiro +2 more·2011·International Journal of Urology

Abstract

Objectives: The risk of prostate cancer among shift workers was examined in the present industry‐based retrospective cohort study. Methods: The study was established based on a health‐care database from a Japanese manufacturing corporation. Work schedules of 4995 male workers (mean age = 55.5 years) were followed up retrospectively; mean follow‐up period = 25.0 years. Of the subjects, 4168 had previously undertaken only daytime work (daytime workers), whereas 827 had undertaken rotating three‐shift work for >80% of their career (shift workers). All subjects had undergone prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) testing. Prostate cancer incidence data were obtained from the health insurance records of 13 daytime and four shift workers. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the relative risk of prostate cancer for the two groups with adjustments for age, body mass index, alcohol intake, smoking, exercise and marital status. Results: Compared with daytime workers, shift workers showed a non‐significant increase in the risk of prostate cancer (odds ratio = 1.79; 95% confidence interval = 0.57, 5.68; P‐value = 0.32). Conclusions: Some increase in the risk of prostate cancer for shift workers was observed, although the result was not statistically significant as a result of the small number of cases. To identify the prostate cancer risk among shift workers, longer‐term follow up, including the period after retirement, is required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02714.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 70

Authors
Kubo, T., Oyama, I., Nakamura, T., Kunimoto, M., Kadowaki, K., Otomo, H., Fujino, Y., Fujimoto, N., Matsumoto, T., & Matsuda, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan (JP)
  • Asahi Kasei (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Kubo, Tatsuhiko
Venue
International Journal of Urology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-20
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
206-211
ISSN
  • 0919-8172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1442-2042
OpenAlex
W1505776154
Cited by
70
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
prostate cancer, shift work, rotating shifts, occupational cancer risk, industrial workers, work schedules, PSA screening, male workers
MeSH terms
Aged, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatic Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Work Schedule Tolerance, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Databases, Factual, Occupational Health, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review