Cited by 47Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research

Retinal autoantibody profile in early age-related macular degeneration: preliminary findings from the Blue Mountains Eye Study

Cherepanoff, Svetlana, Mitchell, Paul, Wang, Jie Jin, Gillies, Mark C·2006·Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the retinal autoantibody profile in individuals with and without early age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to determine whether baseline autoantibodies are associated with progression to advanced AMD 5 and 10 years later. METHODS: Western immunoblotting was used to detect the presence of retinal autoantibodies in the baseline serum of 47 individuals with early AMD and 16 healthy controls from the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Autoantibody isotype, IgG subclass distribution and target antigens in the early AMD group were compared with the control group. The association between baseline autoantibodies and progression to advanced AMD 5 and 10 years later was evaluated using the chi-square test. RESULTS: Retinal autoantibodies were found in a higher proportion of the early AMD group compared with controls (57%vs. 25%, chi2=5.028, P=0.025). Autoantibodies targeted a range of retinal polypeptides in both AMD cases and controls. The commonest polypeptide antigens occurred between 20-35 kDa and 50-60 kDa. More than one IgG subclass was often present in participants with autoantibodies. Over a 10-year period, 11 participants (23.4%) with early AMD progressed to advanced AMD. No association was found between baseline autoantibodies and the development of advanced AMD over 10 years (chi2=0.16, Fisher's exact P=0.59). CONCLUSIONS: The retinal autoantibody profile in early AMD is complex, both in terms of antigenic targets and immunoglobulin isotypes. Detection of potential disease-associated autoantibodies will require a larger sample size and full characterization of the retinal antigens involved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01281.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 47

Authors
Cherepanoff, S., Mitchell, P., Wang, J. J., & Gillies, M. C.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-08
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
590-595
ISSN
  • 1442-6404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1442-9071
OpenAlex
W1927715613
Cited by
47
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Keywords
age-related macular degeneration, retinal autoantibodies, early AMD, retinal antigens, IgG subclasses, autoantibody isotypes, serum autoantibodies, Blue Mountains Eye Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Epitopes, Autoantibodies, Autoantigens, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin Isotypes, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, New South Wales, Retina, Blotting, Western, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review