The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The invasive potential of Australian banksias in South African fynbos: A comparison of the reproductive potential of Banksia ericifolia and Leucadendron laureolum
Abstract
Abstract Several taxa of the Australian Proteaceae have invaded South African fynbos and require costly management programmes to bring under control.Banksia spp. have been introduced only recently to fynbos regions. The invasive potential of Banksia ericifolia(Proteaceae) was investigated by comparing its recruitment potential with that of an indigenous proteaceous shrub,Leucadendron laureolum. Both species are overstorey shrubs that are killed by fire and rely on canopy‐stored seeds (serotiny) for recruitment. Eight year old B. ericifolia shrubs produced an average of 16 500 seeds per plant, which is thirty times more than the average of 570 seeds produced by 10 year old L. laureolum shrubs. The seed bank of B. ericifolia was not only larger than that of L. laureolum(1098 vs 525 viable seeds m−2 projected canopy cover), but also considerably larger than that described for the species in its native environment (200–330 seeds m−2 in a 9 year old stand north of Sydney).Leucadendron laureoleum released most of its seed a few days after the cones were burnt, whereas seed release in B. ericifolia was spread over 12 weeks. The seeds of B. ericifolia had lower wingloading and fall rates than L. laureolum and were dispersed over greater distances. The relative seedling growth rates of the two species were very similar (0.03 g per day), but below‐ground biomass was greater and proteoid roots were more developed in B. ericifolia seedlings than in L. laureolum after 100 days. Four year old B. ericifolia plants growing in the field had attained over twice the height of indigenous pro‐teoids and accumulated up to 10 times the fresh biomass of L. xanthoconus, a species which is ecologically similar to L. laureolum. The Bioclimatic Prediction System (BIOCLIM) was used to create a bioclimatic profile of B. ericifolia and identify climatically suitable areas in the Cape Province. Results show that its potential distribution covers most fynbos areas in the southwestern Cape. It is concluded that B. ericifolia has the potential to be highly invasive in fynbos.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Siegel, S. (1957) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1957.10501091 · Cited by 3,903
BIOCLIM - a bioclimate analysis and prediction system
Busby, J. (1991) · Plant protection quarterly · Cited by 594
The ecology and management of biological invasions in southern Africa.
Macdonald, I. A. W., Kruger, F. J. L., & Ferrar, A. A. (1986) · Management of Biological Invasions · Cited by 476
The Ecology of Fynbos: Nutrients, Fire and Diversity.
Gimingham, C. H., & Cowling, R. (1993) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261237 · Cited by 471
Self-citationAssessing the risk of invasive success in Pinus and Banksia in South African mountain fynbos
Richardson, D. M., Cowling, R. M., & Maître, D. C. L. (1990) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3235569 · Cited by 130
Self-citationWhy Is Mountain Fynbos Invasible and Which Species Invade?
Richardson, D. M., & Cowling, R. M. (1992) · Ecological studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-76174-4_9 · Cited by 90
Self-citationPollination, Reproduction, and Fire
Carpenter, F. L., & Recher, H. F. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283442 · Cited by 89
Seedling Recruitment Strategies in Obligate‐Seeding and Resprouting Banksia Shrubs
Zammit, C. A., & Westoby, M. (1987) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939889 · Cited by 67
Taylor (1988) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004629059 · Cited by 42
Cited by
Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges
Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., Kawabata, Z., Knowler, D. J., Lévêque, C., Naiman, R. J., Prieur‐Richard, A., Soto, D., Stiassny, M. L. J., et al. (2006) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793105006950 · Cited by 8,489
Ecological consequences of genetic diversity
Hughes, A. R., Inouye, B. D., Johnson, M. T. J., Underwood, N., & Vellend, M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01179.x · Cited by 1,834
Characterizing ecosystem‐level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers
Crooks, J. A. (2002) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970201.x · Cited by 1,312
HIERRO, J. L., MARON, J. L., & CALLAWAY, R. M. (2005) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00953.x · Cited by 836
Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species
Ricciardi, A., Hoopes, M. F., Marchetti, M. P., & Lockwood, J. L. (2013) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/13-0183.1 · Cited by 760
Metadata
- Authors
- HONIG, M. A., Cowling, R. M., & RICHARDSON, D. M.
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 305-314
- ISSN
- 0307-692X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075887748
- Cited by
- 938
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The invasive potential of Australian banksias in South African fynbos: A comparison of the reproductive potential of Banksia ericifolia and Leucadendron laureolum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1992.tb00812.x
- The paper
- HONIG, M. A., Cowling, R. M., & RICHARDSON, D. M. (1992). The invasive potential of Australian banksias in South African fynbos: A comparison of the reproductive potential of Banksia ericifolia and Leucadendron laureolum. Australian Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1992.tb00812.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.