The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR EARLY GASTRIC CANCER: TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY, OPERATION TIME AND COMPLICATIONS FROM A LARGE CONSECUTIVE SERIES
Open accessAbstract
Background: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a recognized treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). One‐piece resection is considered to be a gold standard of EMR, as it provides accurate histological assessment and reduces the risk of local recurrence. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a new technique developed to obtain one‐piece resection even for large and ulcerative lesions. The present study aims to identify the technical feasibility, operation time and complications from a large consecutive series. Methods: We reviewed all patients with EGC who underwent ESD using the IT knife at National Cancer Center Hospital in the period between January 2000 and December 2003. Results: During the study period of 4 years we identified a total of 1033 EGC lesions in 945 consecutive patients who underwent ESD using the IT knife. We found a one‐piece resection rate (OPRR) of 98% (1008/1033). Our OPRR with tumor‐free margins was 93% (957/1033). On subgroup analysis it was found to be 86% (271/314) among large lesions (≥ 21 mm) and 89% (216/243) among ulcerative lesions. The overall non‐evaluable resection rate was 1.8% (19/1033). The median operation time was 60 min (range; 10–540 min). Evidence of immediate bleeding was found in 7%. Delayed bleeding after ESD was seen in 6% and perforation in 4% of the cases. All cases with complications except one were successfully treated by endoscopic treatment. Conclusion: The present study shows the technical feasibility of ESD, which provides one‐piece resections even in large and ulcerative EGC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer
Gotoda, T., Yamamoto, H., & Soetikno, R. M. (2006) · Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1007/s00535-006-1954-3 · Cited by 686
Self-citationEndoscopic resection of early gastric cancer
Gotoda, T. (2007) · Gastric Cancer · doi:10.1007/s10120-006-0408-1 · Cited by 666
Self-citationBanks, M., Graham, D., Jansen, M., Gotoda, T., Coda, S., di Pietro, M., Uedo, N., Bhandari, P., Pritchard, D. M., Kuipers, E. J., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318126 · Cited by 647
Self-citationEndoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study
Isomoto, H., Shikuwa, S., Yamaguchi, N., Fukuda, E., Ikeda, K., Nishiyama, H., Ohnita, K., Mizuta, Y., Shiozawa, J., & Kohno, S. (2009) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2008.165381 · Cited by 640
Metadata
- Authors
- Oda, I., Gotoda, T., Hamanaka, H., Eguchi, T., Saito, Y., Matsuda, T., Bhandari, P., Emura, F., Saito, D., & Ono, H.
- Venue
- Digestive Endoscopy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-12-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-58
- ISSN
- 0915-5635 (ISSN-L)
- 1443-1661
- OpenAlex
- W2087416149
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR EARLY GASTRIC CANCER: TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY, OPERATION TIME AND COMPLICATIONS FROM A LARGE CONSECUTIVE SERIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1443-1661.2005.00459.x
- The paper
- Oda, I., Gotoda, T., Hamanaka, H., Eguchi, T., Saito, Y., Matsuda, T., Bhandari, P., Emura, F., Saito, D., & Ono, H. (2005). ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR EARLY GASTRIC CANCER: TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY, OPERATION TIME AND COMPLICATIONS FROM A LARGE CONSECUTIVE SERIES. Digestive Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1443-1661.2005.00459.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.