Cited by 83Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionDiabetes Treatment and Management

An Australian cardiovascular risk equation for type 2 diabetes: the Fremantle Diabetes Study

Davis, W. A., Knuiman, M. W., Davis, T. M. E.·2010·Internal Medicine Journal

Abstract

Background There is no valid cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction equation for Australians with diabetes. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a multivariate risk function for 5-year cardiovascular risk prediction in Australian type 2 diabetes patients. Methods The Fremantle Diabetes Study is a community-based longitudinal observational study. A total of 1240 type 2 diabetic patients (95.8% of the baseline cohort) with all required risk factor data were followed from baseline (1993-1996) for 5 years or until they experienced a cardiovascular event or died, whichever came first. CVD during follow up was defined as hospitalization for/with myocardial infarction or stroke, and death from cardiac or cerebrovascular causes or sudden death. Validation of the algorithm was performed on an independent diabetic cohort from the Busselton Health Study. Results During 5570 patient-years of follow up, 185 (14.9%) had at least one CVD event and 175 (14.1%) died (57.7% from CVD). Variables in the final model comprised age, sex, prior CVD, ln(urinary albumin : creatinine ratio), lnHbA(1c), ln(high density lipoprotein-cholesterol), Southern European ethnic background and Aboriginality. The mean 5-year predicted risk of a CVD event was 15.5%. Applied to the Busselton cohort, discrimination of the model was good (AUC = 0.84, P Conclusion This simple diabetes-specific 5-year CVD risk equation is the first validated, population-based Australian model. It should have a role in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.01958.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, W. A., Knuiman, M. W., & Davis, T. M. E.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Davis, W. A.
Venue
Internal Medicine Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
286-292
ISSN
  • 1444-0903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1445-5994
OpenAlex
W2019950898
Cited by
83
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2010-05-18)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Internal Medicine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular risk prediction, risk prediction equations, Fremantle Diabetes Study, Busselton Health Study, cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, urinary albumin-creatinine ratio, HbA1c, HDL cholesterol, Aboriginality, ethnicity, model validation, Australian population
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Australia, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Risk Factors, Western Australia, Cohort Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review