Prediction of risk for vasa previa at 9–13 weeks’ gestation
Abstract
Aim: To assess the usefulness for predicting vasa previa by detecting a cord insertion site in the lower third of the uterus between 9 and 13 weeks' gestation. Methods: The positional relationship between the uterine cavity and the cord insertion site was examined in consecutive subjects prospectively using ultrasonography at 9–13 weeks' gestation. The distance between the internal os and the fundus was divided equally into three parts. Cord insertions in the lower third were defined as cases; other insertions were defined as controls. Placental and umbilical cord abnormalities at the time of the delivery were analyzed between the two groups. Results: The cord insertion sites were identified as 139 (10.6%) cases with low cord insertion and 1172 control cases. The case subjects frequently had an abnormal placental form (6.5% vs 2.1%, RR 3.2, 95% CI 1.5–7.0) or placenta previa (4.7% vs 1.3%, RR 3.5, 95% CI 1.3–9.1). The frequencies of velamentous cord insertion were 7.2% in cases and 0.9% in controls (RR 8.1, 95% CI 3.4–19.6). Three cases (2.2%) of vasa previa were observed in the cases, but none were observed in the controls (P = 0.001). Placental abruption occurred in 4.3% of the cases and 0.9% of the controls (RR 4.7, 95% CI 1.7–13.1). Conclusion: Screening sonography in the late first or early second trimesters and following up at the second trimester in cases with low cord insertion is a useful way to detect vasa previa.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pregnancies with low cord insertion presented with a significantly higher risk of vasa previa (p = 0.001) compared to central umbilical insertion.
“Additionally, pregnancies with low cord insertion presented with a significantly higher risk of vasa previa (p = 0.001) compared to central umbilical insertion [64].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [64]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Incidence of and risk indicators for vasa praevia: a systematic review
Ruiter, L., Kok, N., Limpens, J., Derks, J., de Graaf, I., Mol, B., & Pajkrt, E. (2016) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13829 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Ultrasound screening of umbilical cord abnormalities and delivery management
Hasegawa, J. (2018) · Placenta · doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2017.12.003 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationBuchanan-Hughes, A., Bobrowska, A., Visintin, C., Attilakos, G., & Marshall, J. (2020) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-020-01355-0 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
- Authors
- Hasegawa, J., Nakamura, M., Sekizawa, A., Matsuoka, R., Ichizuka, K., & Okai, T.
- Affiliations
- SHOWA Medical University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Hasegawa, Junichi
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05-12
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1346-1351
- ISSN
- 1341-8076 (ISSN-L)
- 1447-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2112166576
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Keywords
- vasa previa, placenta previa, placental abruption, velamentous cord insertion, placental abnormalities, prenatal screening, second-trimester ultrasound, risk prediction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Placenta, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prospective Studies, Risk, Risk Factors, Ultrasonography, Umbilical Cord, Vasa Previa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review