Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Campaign Ads, Online Messaging, and Participation: Extending the Communication Mediation Model: Extending Communication Mediation

Shah, Dhavan V., Cho, Jaeho, Nah, Seungahn, Gotlieb, Melissa R., Hwang, Hyunseo, Lee, Nam-Jin, Scholl, Rosanne M., McLeod, Douglas M.·2007·Journal of Communication

Abstract

Political communication researchers have devoted a great deal of attention to the role of political advertising, the Internet, and political discussion in civic and political life. In this article, we integrate and extend this research by developing a campaign communication mediation model of civic and campaign participation. Two data sets are merged for this inquiry: (a) content-coded ad-buy data on the placement of campaign messages on a market-by-market and program-by-program basis and (b) a national panel study concerning patterns of traditional and digital media consumption and levels of civic and campaign participation. Exposure to televised campaign advertising is estimated by developing an algorithm based on the market and program placement of specific ads and geocoded survey respondents’ viewing of certain categories of television content in which these ads were concentrated. Structural equation models reveal that advertising exposure drives online news use in ways that complement conventional news influences on political discussion and political messaging. However, campaign exposure emphasizing “attack” messages appears to diminish information seeking motivations via broadcast and print media, yet only indirectly and weakly suppresses participation in civic and political life. Further, alternative specifications reveal that our original model produces the best fit, empirically and theoretically. We use these insights to propose an O-S-R-O-R (orientations-stimuli-reasoning-orientations-responses) framework as an alternative to the longstanding O-S-O-R model in communication and social psychology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00363.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Pfau, 2001, The effects of party-and PAC-sponsored issue advertising and the potential inoculation to combat its impacts on the democratic process, American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2379, 10.1177/00027640121958384 · doi:10.1177/00027640121958384
  2. Price, 2002, Online deliberation and its influence: The Electronic dialogue project in campaign 2000, IT & Society, 1, 303
  3. Ridout, 2004, Evaluating measures of campaign advertising exposure on political learning, Political Behavior, 26, 201, 10.1023/B:POBE.0000043453.96025.a8 · doi:10.1023/b:pobe.0000043453.96025.a8

Metadata

Authors
Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N.-J., Scholl, R. M., & McLeod, D. M.
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
2007-12-12
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
676-703
ISSN
0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098641598
Cited by
384
References
48
FWCI
30.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 2820 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Campaign Ads, Online Messaging, and Participation: Extending the Communication Mediation Model: Extending Communication Mediation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00363.x
The paper
Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N.-J., Scholl, R. M., & McLeod, D. M. (2007). Campaign Ads, Online Messaging, and Participation: Extending the Communication Mediation Model: Extending Communication Mediation. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00363.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.