The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences
Abstract
When Bob Garfield outlined his “Chaos Scenario” in 2005, he argued that the existing media model was collapsing and that the consumer was gaining more control in the media marketplace (Garfield, 2005). At the time, digital video recorder (DVR) technology was still relatively new, the most up-to-date cellular phone was Motorola's ROKR with the capacity for 100 songs to be played using Apple's iTunes software and the idea of social networking was in the early stages—MySpace was just about a year older than Facebook and Twitter did not exist. Smartphones can now be used to program a DVR, make a phone call, watch a movie, listen to thousands of songs, capture video, send a text message, surf the Internet and post a status update to a social network that boasts approximately 500 million users. These types of advances in media production, distribution, and consumption technologies have played a major role in the fragmentation of the industry, as well as the evolution of the media audience from a predominantly passive, mass audience to an active niche audience with more autonomy, power, and control of media choices. Through a careful analysis of historical trends, technological advances, developments in research methodologies and shifts in policy and regulations, Philip Napoli synthesizes academic studies and industry research to explore new media technologies and their effect on the transformation of media audiences, especially in the context of media and audience fragmentation. The end result is a shift from a production culture where the philosophy of the media is to provide content to large and passive audiences to a consumption culture where the media's control of content and distribution decisions have diminished in favor of the autonomous audience. It is in the contextualization of the autonomous audience that Napoli outlines the current problems facing a media industry where audience migration is leading to dwindling advertising revenue. The reality is that the industry needs to rethink the traditional models and embrace an autonomous audience that controls media consumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On the Democratic Role of News Recommenders
Helberger, N. (2019) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2019.1623700 · Cited by 384
Reciprocal Journalism: A concept of mutual exchange between journalists and audiences
Lewis, S. C., Holton, A. E., & Coddington, M. (2014) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2013.859840 · Cited by 382
Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice
Christin, A. (2017) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717718855 · Cited by 379
One click, many meanings: interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media
Hayes, R. A., Carr, C. T., & Wohn, D. Y. (2016) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2015.1127248 · Cited by 346
Media consumption across platforms: Identifying user-defined repertoires
Taneja, H., Webster, J. G., Malthouse, E. C., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444811436146 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Chambers, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- E1-E4
- ISSN
- 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141494577
- Cited by
- 631
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01572.x
- The paper
- Chambers, T. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01572.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.