Framing the Egyptian Uprising in Arabic Language Newspapers and Social Media
Abstract
This study examines the framing of Egypt's January 2011 uprising in the country's state-run, independent and social media using a unique dataset of Arabic language content from newspapers and key social media posts collected during the peak of protests. Semiofficial (governmental) newspapers framed the event as “a conspiracy on the Egyptian state,” warning of economic consequence and attributing blame and responsibility for the chaos on others. Social media posts used a human interest frame defining protests as “a revolution for freedom and social justice” and independent newspapers used a combination of these frames. Findings point toward the potential roles that news media will play in shaping public opinion and demonstrate why social media have wide appeal in times of political crisis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social media in general, and Twitter in particular, have enormous capacity to elevate and sustain counterpublic voices and refocus the attention of the mainstream public sphere.
“While much of so-called 'activism' online is quite inactive in terms of sustained social change, recent work illustrates the enormous capacity for social media in general, and Twitter in particular, to elevate and sustain counterpublic voices and refocus the attention of the mainstream public sphere (Hamdy & Gomaa, 2012;Lewis, Gray, & Meierhenrich, 2014;Papacharissi & de Fatima Oliveira, 2012).”
From #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks (2016) · cites this paper as Hamdy & Gomaa, 2012
Cites
Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm
Entman, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x · Cited by 16,203 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
#Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counterpublic networks
Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B. (2016) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1106571 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hamdy, N., & Gomaa, E. H.
- Affiliations
- American University in Cairo (EG)
- Alexandria University (EG)
- Venue
- Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-03-16
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-211
- ISSN
- 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016717758
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 65.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Keywords
- framing, social media, state media, independent media, political crisis, public opinion, human interest framing, Egypt
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review