The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Transforming Growth Factor β1, on Scar Production in the Injured Central Nervous System of the Rat
Abstract
In the central nervous system (CNS), nerve regeneration after traumatic injury fails. The formation of a dense fibrous scar is thought to restrict in part the growth of axonal projections, providing one of the many reasons that complete lesions of neural pathways in the adult mammalian CNS are rarely followed by significant functional recovery. In order to determine which mechanisms mediate scar formation in the CNS and to investigate whether they can be modulated in vivo, we have attempted to define the potential role of trophic factors. Our previous studies have shown the focal elevation of transforming growth factor β 1 (TGFβ 1) expression in lesioned CNS tissue. In the studies described here, we demonstrate that TGFβ 1 participates in the scarring response in the rat brain. First, the elevated protein levels of TGFβ 1 are localized to specific populations of injury‐responsive cells in the traumatized CNS. Furthermore, the injection of TGFβ 1 into the brains of injured rats causes a dramatic increase in the scarring response. Conversely, when neutralizing TGFβ 1 antibodies are administered, the deposition of fibrous scar tissue and the formation of a limiting glial membrane that borders the lesion is significantly attenuated, thus establishing a role for the endogenous growth factor in regulation of the non‐glial component of the scar. In implicating TGFβ 1 in the scarring response in the CNS, the potential use for TGFβ 1 antagonists as inhibitors of scar formation in the injured mammalian CNS is self‐evident.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ignotz, R. A., & Massagué, J. (1986) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)35666-1 · Cited by 2,492
Cited by
Inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease
Akiyama, H. (2000) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00124-x · Cited by 4,514
Microglia are an essential component of the neuroprotective scar that forms after spinal cord injury
Bellver-Landete, V., Bretheau, F., Mailhot, B., Vallières, N., Lessard, M., Janelle, M.-E., Vernoux, N., Tremblay, M.-È., Fuehrmann, T., Shoichet, M. S., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08446-0 · Cited by 594
The duality of the inflammatory response to traumatic brain injury
McIntosh, T. K., Lenzlinger, P. M., Morganti-Kossmann, M.-C., & Laurer, H. L. (2001) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1385/mn:24:1-3:169 · Cited by 428
Transforming growth factor‐β in stem cells and tissue homeostasis
Xu, X., Zheng, L., Yuan, Q., Zhen, G., Crane, J. L., Zhou, X., & Cao, X. (2018) · Bone Research · doi:10.1038/s41413-017-0005-4 · Cited by 414
TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR-βS IN NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE
FLANDERS, K. (1998) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00066-x · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Logan, A., Berry, M., Gonzalez, A. M., Frautschy, S. A., Sporn, M. B., & Baird, A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 355-363
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W1964801456
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.