The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence
Abstract
We review and synthesize recent developments in the study of the spread of invasive species, emphasizing both empirical and theoretical approaches. Recent theoretical work has shown that invasive species spread is a much more complex process than the classical models suggested, as long range dispersal events can have a large influence on the rate of range expansion through time. Empirical work goes even further, emphasizing the role of spatial heterogeneity, temporal variability, other species, and evolution. As in some of the classic work on spread, the study of range expansion of invasive species provides unique opportunities to use differences between theory and data to determine the important underlying processes that control spread rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Predicting the spatial dynamics of rabies epidemics on heterogeneous landscapes
Smith, D. L., Lucey, B., Waller, L. A., Childs, J. E., & Real, L. A. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.042400799 · Cited by 378
Mihulka, S., & Pyšek, P. (2001) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00574.x · Cited by 98 · cited 3×
“Within a given geographic area, the cumulative numbers of records of a species over time is sometimes used as a measure of increasing abundance (Pysek & Prach 1993; Mihulka & Pysek 2001 ).”
Background
Cited by
Testing for ancient admixture between closely related populations
Durand, E. Y., Patterson, N., Reich, D., & Slatkin, M. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr048 · Cited by 1,375
Leighton, P. A., Koffi, J. K., Pelcat, Y., Lindsay, L. R., & Ogden, N. H. (2012) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02112.x · Cited by 273
Parallel adaptation: one or many waves of advance of an advantageous allele?
Ralph, P., & Coop, G. (2010) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.110.119594 · Cited by 165
Patterns of Geographic Expansion of Aedes aegypti in the Peruvian Amazon
Guagliardo, S. A., Barboza, J. L., Morrison, A. C., Astete, H., Vazquez-Prokopec, G., & Kitron, U. (2014) · PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003033 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Hastings, A., Cuddington, K., Davies, K. F., Dugaw, C. J., Elmendorf, S., Freestone, A., Harrison, S., Holland, M., Lambrinos, J., Malvadkar, U., Melbourne, B. A., Moore, K., Taylor, C., & Thomson, D.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-101
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2100675615
- Cited by
- 921
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00687.x
- The paper
- Hastings, A., Cuddington, K., Davies, K. F., Dugaw, C. J., Elmendorf, S., Freestone, A., Harrison, S., Holland, M., Lambrinos, J., Malvadkar, U., Melbourne, B. A., Moore, K., Taylor, C., & Thomson, D. (2005). The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00687.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
