The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis
Abstract
In this study, we ask if instead of being fundamentally opposed, niche and neutral theories could simply be located at the extremes of a continuum. First, we present a model of recruitment probabilities that combines both niche and neutral processes. From this model, we predict and test whether the relative importance of niche vs. neutral processes in controlling community dynamics will vary depending on community species richness, niche overlap and dispersal capabilities of species (both local and long distance). Results demonstrate that niche and neutrality form ends of a continuum from competitive to stochastic exclusion. In the absence of immigration, competitive exclusion tends to create a regular spacing of niches. However, immigration prevents the establishment of a limiting similarity. The equilibrium community consists of a set of complementary and redundant species, with their abundance determined, respectively, by the distribution of environmental conditions and the amount of immigration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645
Cited by
Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology?
Zhou, J., & Ning, D. (2017) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00002-17 · Cited by 2,773
A general framework for quantitatively assessing ecological stochasticity
Ning, D., Deng, Y., Tiedje, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1904623116 · Cited by 1,255
Habitat fragmentation and species diversity in competitive communities
Rybicki, J., Abrego, N., & Ovaskainen, O. (2020) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13450 · Cited by 157
Seed arrival and ecological filters interact to assemble high-diversity plant communities
Myers, J. A., & Harms, K. E. (2011) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/10-1001.1 · Cited by 140
Hill, M. J., Heino, J., Thornhill, I., Ryves, D. B., & Wood, P. J. (2017) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/oik.04266 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Gravel, D., Canham, C. D., Beaudet, M., & Messier, C.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-02-16
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 399-409
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2106890697
- Cited by
- 828
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00884.x
- The paper
- Gravel, D., Canham, C. D., Beaudet, M., & Messier, C. (2006). Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00884.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.