The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the ecology in ecotoxicology: a review and synthesis in freshwater systems
Abstract
The field of ecotoxicology is experiencing a surge in attention among ecologists as we gain a deeper appreciation for how contaminants can impact natural ecosystems. This interest is particularly strong in aquatic systems where many non‐target organisms experience pesticides. In this article, we assess how pesticides affect freshwater systems by applying the conceptual framework of density‐ and trait‐mediated indirect effects from the field of basic ecology. We demonstrate the utility of this framework for understanding the conditions under which pesticides affect species interactions, communities and ecosystems. Through the integration of laboratory toxicity tests and this ecological framework, ecotoxicologists should be better able to identify the mechanisms through which pesticides affect communities and ecosystems. We also identify several areas of research that are in critical need of empirical attention including synergistic effects between pesticides and natural stressors, the importance of pesticides on community assembly via habitat preferences and oviposition effects, the timing and frequency of pesticide applications, pesticide effects on population dynamics, the evolution of pesticide resistance in non‐target organisms and ecosystem recovery. With this knowledge, one can improve upon management decisions and help protect non‐target species that are of conservation concern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., & Buxton, H. T. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011055j · Cited by 7,953
Cited by
Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems
Crain, C. M., Kroeker, K., & Halpern, B. S. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01253.x · Cited by 2,141
Understanding of the impact of chemicals on amphibians: a meta‐analytic review
Egea‐Serrano, A., Relyea, R. A., Tejedo, M., & Torralva, M. (2012) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.249 · Cited by 279
Self-citationUNDERSTANDING THE NET EFFECTS OF PESTICIDES ON AMPHIBIAN TREMATODE INFECTIONS
Rohr, J. R., Raffel, T. R., Sessions, S. K., & Hudson, P. J. (2008) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/07-1429.1 · Cited by 209
Developing a broader scientific foundation for river restoration: Columbia River food webs
Naiman, R. J., Alldredge, J. R., Beauchamp, D. A., Bisson, P. A., Congleton, J., Henny, C. J., Huntly, N., Lamberson, R., Levings, C., Merrill, E. N., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1213408109 · Cited by 148
Ito, H. C., Shiraishi, H., Nakagawa, M., & Takamura, N. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229052 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Relyea, R., & Hoverman, J.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1157-1171
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2167764865
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the ecology in ecotoxicology: a review and synthesis in freshwater systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00966.x
- The paper
- Relyea, R., & Hoverman, J. (2006). Assessing the ecology in ecotoxicology: a review and synthesis in freshwater systems. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00966.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.