The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Allometric scaling enhances stability in complex food webs
Abstract
Classic local stability theory predicts that complex ecological networks are unstable and are unlikely to persist despite empiricists’ abundant documentation of such complexity in nature. This contradiction has puzzled biologists for decades. While some have explored how stability may be achieved in small modules of a few interacting species, rigorous demonstrations of how large complex and ecologically realistic networks dynamically persist remain scarce and inadequately understood. Here, we help fill this void by combining structural models of complex food webs with nonlinear bioenergetic models of population dynamics parameterized by biological rates that are allometrically scaled to populations’ average body masses. Increasing predator–prey body mass ratios increase population persistence up to a saturation level that is reached by invertebrate and ectotherm vertebrate predators when being 10 or 100 times larger than their prey respectively. These values are corroborated by empirical predator–prey body mass ratios from a global data base. Moreover, negative effects of diversity (i.e. species richness) on stability (i.e. population persistence) become neutral or positive relationships at these empirical ratios. These results demonstrate that the predator–prey body mass ratios found in nature may be key to enabling persistence of populations in complex food webs and stabilizing the diversity of natural ecosystems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Will a Large Complex System be Stable?
MAY, R. M. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238413a0 · Cited by 2,869
Food Webs: Linkage, Interaction Strength and Community Infrastructure
Paine, R. T. (1980) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4220 · Cited by 1,824
The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs.
McCann, K. S., Rasmussen, J. B., & Umbanhowar, J. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00742.x · Cited by 648
Cited by
Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere
Barnosky, A. D., Hadly, E. A., Bascompte, J., Berlow, E. L., Brown, J. H., Fortelius, M., Getz, W. M., Harte, J., Hastings, A., Marquet, P. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11018 · Cited by 1,966
Self-citationCompilation and Network Analyses of Cambrian Food Webs
Dunne, J. A., Williams, R. J., Martinez, N. D., Wood, R. A., & Erwin, D. H. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060102 · Cited by 269
Self-citationJiang, L., & Pu, Z. (2009) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/605961 · Cited by 190
Williams, R. J., Anandanadesan, A., & Purves, D. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012092 · Cited by 117
Self-citationPyramids and cascades: a synthesis of food chain functioning and stability
Barbier, M., & Loreau, M. (2019) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13196 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Brose, U., Williams, R. J., & Martinez, N. D.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-10-13
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1228-1236
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2025278182
- Cited by
- 623
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.