The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A trait‐based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within‐ and among‐community components
Abstract
Plant functional traits vary both along environmental gradients and among species occupying similar conditions, creating a challenge for the synthesis of functional and community ecology. We present a trait‐based approach that provides an additive decomposition of species’ trait values into alpha and beta components: beta values refer to a species’ position along a gradient defined by community‐level mean trait values; alpha values are the difference between a species’ trait values and the mean of co‐occurring taxa. In woody plant communities of coastal California, beta trait values for specific leaf area, leaf size, wood density and maximum height all covary strongly, reflecting species distributions across a gradient of soil moisture availability. Alpha values, on the other hand, are generally not significantly correlated, suggesting several independent axes of differentiation within communities. This trait‐based framework provides a novel approach to integrate functional ecology and gradient analysis with community ecology and coexistence theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Self-citationMechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
Cited by
Cornwell, W. K., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Amatangelo, K., Dorrepaal, E., Eviner, V. T., Godoy, O., Hobbie, S. E., Hoorens, B., Kurokawa, H., Pérez‐Harguindeguy, N., et al. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x · Cited by 2,855
Self-citationTRY – a global database of plant traits
KATTGE, J., DÍAZ, S., LAVOREL, S., PRENTICE, I. C., LEADLEY, P., BÖNISCH, G., GARNIER, E., WESTOBY, M., REICH, P. B., WRIGHT, I. J., et al. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x · Cited by 2,638
Self-citationA functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances
Mouillot, D., Graham, N. A. J., Villéger, S., Mason, N. W. H., & Bellwood, D. R. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.004 · Cited by 2,117
The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology
Violle, C., Enquist, B. J., McGill, B. J., Jiang, L., Albert, C. H., Hulshof, C., Jung, V., & Messier, J. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.014 · Cited by 1,768
Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory
HilleRisLambers, J., Adler, P. B., Harpole, W. S., Levine, J. M., & Mayfield, M. M. (2012) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160411 · Cited by 1,448
Metadata
- Authors
- Ackerly, D. D., & Cornwell, W. K.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-15
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-145
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2111568029
- Cited by
- 781
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A trait‐based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within‐ and among‐community components. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.01006.x
- The paper
- Ackerly, D. D., & Cornwell, W. K. (2007). A trait‐based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within‐ and among‐community components. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.01006.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
