The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disturbance, invasion and re‐invasion: managing the weed‐shaped hole in disturbed ecosystems
Abstract
We aim to develop a simple model to explore how disturbance and propagule pressure determine conditions for successful invasion in systems where recruitment occurs only in disturbed sites. Disturbance is often thought to favour invaders as it allows recruitment; however, the effects of disturbance are more complicated when it results in mortality of the invader. When disturbance rates in both invader occupied and unoccupied sites are the same, recruitment and mortality effects are exactly balanced, and successful invasion is independent of the disturbance regime. Differences in the disturbance rates between invader occupied and unoccupied sites can occur through invader modification or management of disturbance. Under these conditions, we found a novel mechanism for the generation of an Allee effect, which occurs when the invader promotes disturbance in sites it already occupies. When Allee effects occur one‐off, large‐scale disturbances can result in permanent, dramatic shifts in invader abundance; and conversely, reducing the population below a critical threshold can cause extinction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biological Invasions by Exotic Grasses, the Grass/Fire Cycle, and Global Change
D'Antonio, C. M., & Vitousek, P. M. (1992) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000431 · Cited by 3,399
Effects of Productivity and Disturbance on Species Richness: A Neutral Model
Kadmon, R., & Benjamini, Y. (2006) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/504602 · Cited by 83
Cited by
Catford, J. A., Jansson, R., & Nilsson, C. (2009) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.x · Cited by 1,154
Something in the way you move: dispersal pathways affect invasion success
Wilson, J. R. U., Dormontt, E. E., Prentis, P. J., Lowe, A. J., & Richardson, D. M. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.007 · Cited by 890
Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species
Ricciardi, A., Hoopes, M. F., Marchetti, M. P., & Lockwood, J. L. (2013) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/13-0183.1 · Cited by 760
Resource competition in plant invasions: emerging patterns and research needs
Gioria, M., & Osborne, B. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00501 · Cited by 437
Pandora's Box Contained Bait: The Global Problem of Introduced Earthworms
Hendrix, P. F., Callaham, M. A., Drake, J. M., Huang, C.-Y., James, S. W., Snyder, B. A., & Zhang, W. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173426 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Buckley, Y. M., Bolker, B. M., & Rees, M.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07-27
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 809-817
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2168216205
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disturbance, invasion and re‐invasion: managing the weed‐shaped hole in disturbed ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01067.x
- The paper
- Buckley, Y. M., Bolker, B. M., & Rees, M. (2007). Disturbance, invasion and re‐invasion: managing the weed‐shaped hole in disturbed ecosystems. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01067.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.