The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do differences in food web structure between organic and conventional farms affect the ecosystem service of pest control?
Open accessAbstract
While many studies have demonstrated that organic farms support greater levels of biodiversity, it is not known whether this translates into better provision of ecosystem services. Here we use a food‐web approach to analyse the community structure and function at the whole‐farm scale. Quantitative food webs from 10 replicate pairs of organic and conventional farms showed that organic farms have significantly more species at three trophic levels (plant, herbivore and parasitoid) and significantly different network structure. Herbivores on organic farms were attacked by more parasitoid species on organic farms than on conventional farms. However, differences in network structure did not translate into differences in robustness to simulated species loss and we found no difference in percentage parasitism (natural pest control) across a variety of host species. Furthermore, a manipulative field experiment demonstrated that the higher species richness of parasitoids on the organic farms did not increase mortality of a novel herbivore used to bioassay ecosystem service. The explanation for these differences is likely to include inherent differences in management strategies and landscape structure between the two farming systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01014 · Cited by 7,957
The Economic Value of Ecological Services Provided by Insects
LOSEY, J. E., & VAUGHAN, M. (2006) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[311:tevoes]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,942
Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies
Moran, M. D. (2003) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12010.x · Cited by 1,484
Cited by
Intensive agriculture reduces soil biodiversity across Europe
Tsiafouli, M. A., Thébault, E., Sgardelis, S. P., de Ruiter, P. C., van der Putten, W. H., Birkhofer, K., Hemerik, L., de Vries, F. T., Bardgett, R. D., Brady, M. V., et al. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12752 · Cited by 1,108
Scale matters: the impact of organic farming on biodiversity at different spatial scales
Gabriel, D., Sait, S. M., Hodgson, J. A., Schmutz, U., Kunin, W. E., & Benton, T. G. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01481.x · Cited by 484
Does landscape composition affect pest abundance and their control by natural enemies? A review
Veres, A., Petit, S., Conord, C., & Lavigne, C. (2013) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.027 · Cited by 450
Biological Control of Insect Pests in Agroecosystems
Rusch, A., Valantin-Morison, M., Sarthou, J.-P., & Roger-Estrade, J. (2010) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385040-9.00006-2 · Cited by 254
Crowder, D. W., & Jabbour, R. (2014) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.10.010 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Macfadyen, S., Gibson, R., Polaszek, A., Morris, R. J., Craze, P. G., Planqué, R., Symondson, W. O. C., & Memmott, J.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02-18
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-238
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2098637141
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do differences in food web structure between organic and conventional farms affect the ecosystem service of pest control? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01279.x
- The paper
- Macfadyen, S., Gibson, R., Polaszek, A., Morris, R. J., Craze, P. G., Planqué, R., Symondson, W. O. C., & Memmott, J. (2009). Do differences in food web structure between organic and conventional farms affect the ecosystem service of pest control? Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01279.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.