Nine decades of decreasing phenotypic variability in Atlantic cod
Abstract
Changes in phenotypic variability in natural populations have received little attention in comparison with changes in mean trait values. This is unfortunate because trait diversity may influence adaptive evolutionary change and population stability. We combine two unique data sets to illuminate complex trait changes in Atlantic cod along the Norwegian Skagerrak coast: (i) an annual beach seine survey starting in 1919, monitoring juvenile body size and abundance and (ii) capture-mark-recapture data from which we estimated selection on juvenile body size and growth. We demonstrate that the variability of juvenile size has been steadily decreasing across nine decades, with no evidence for a similar trend in mean size. We also report that small, slow-growing fish as well as large, fast-growing fish are selected against. Together, these results suggest long-term stabilizing selection acting on Atlantic cod, and emphasize the need for further studies evaluating the full complexity of trait changes in wild populations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Atlantic cod fits in this category, having a high scope for local adaptations but limited scope for phenotypic plasticity.
“Atlantic cod also fits in this category, having a high scope for local adaptations (Knutsen et al., 2003;Olsen et al., 2008Olsen et al., , 2009)).”
From Evolutionary and ecological constraints of fish spawning habitats (2015) · cites this paper as Olsen et al., 2009
Cites
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (1998) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2917-7 · Cited by 3,387 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolutionary and ecological constraints of fish spawning habitats
Ciannelli, L., Bailey, K., & Olsen, E. M. (2015) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsu145 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationTrends and management implications of human‐influenced life‐history changes in marine ectotherms
Audzijonyte, A., Fulton, E., Haddon, M., Helidoniotis, F., Hobday, A. J., Kuparinen, A., Morrongiello, J., Smith, A. D., Upston, J., & Waples, R. S. (2016) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12156 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
- Authors
- Olsen, E. M., Carlson, S. M., Gjøsæter, J., & Stenseth, N. C.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian Institute of Marine Research (NO)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Stenseth, Nils Chr.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 622-631
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2162445330
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecology Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- Gadus morhua, phenotypic variability, stabilizing selection, natural selection, growth rate, long-term population change, mark-recapture, Skagerrak
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Norway, Phenotype, Population Density, Selection, Genetic, Time Factors, Gadus morhua, Body Size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review