Cited by 76Marine and fisheries researchAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Nine decades of decreasing phenotypic variability in Atlantic cod

Olsen, Esben Moland, Carlson, Stephanie M., Gjøsæter, Jakob, Stenseth, Nils Chr.·2009·Ecology Letters

Abstract

Changes in phenotypic variability in natural populations have received little attention in comparison with changes in mean trait values. This is unfortunate because trait diversity may influence adaptive evolutionary change and population stability. We combine two unique data sets to illuminate complex trait changes in Atlantic cod along the Norwegian Skagerrak coast: (i) an annual beach seine survey starting in 1919, monitoring juvenile body size and abundance and (ii) capture-mark-recapture data from which we estimated selection on juvenile body size and growth. We demonstrate that the variability of juvenile size has been steadily decreasing across nine decades, with no evidence for a similar trend in mean size. We also report that small, slow-growing fish as well as large, fast-growing fish are selected against. Together, these results suggest long-term stabilizing selection acting on Atlantic cod, and emphasize the need for further studies evaluating the full complexity of trait changes in wild populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01311.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Atlantic cod fits in this category, having a high scope for local adaptations but limited scope for phenotypic plasticity.

    “Atlantic cod also fits in this category, having a high scope for local adaptations (Knutsen et al., 2003;Olsen et al., 2008Olsen et al., , 2009)).”

    From Evolutionary and ecological constraints of fish spawning habitats (2015) · cites this paper as Olsen et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olsen, E. M., Carlson, S. M., Gjøsæter, J., & Stenseth, N. C.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian Institute of Marine Research (NO)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Stenseth, Nils Chr.
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06-05
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
622-631
ISSN
  • 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-0248
OpenAlex
W2162445330
Cited by
76
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
Gadus morhua, phenotypic variability, stabilizing selection, natural selection, growth rate, long-term population change, mark-recapture, Skagerrak
MeSH terms
Animals, Norway, Phenotype, Population Density, Selection, Genetic, Time Factors, Gadus morhua, Body Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review