Are treelines advancing? A global meta‐analysis of treeline response to climate warming
Abstract
Treelines are temperature sensitive transition zones that are expected to respond to climate warming by advancing beyond their current position. Response to climate warming over the last century, however, has been mixed, with some treelines showing evidence of recruitment at higher altitudes and/or latitudes (advance) whereas others reveal no marked change in the upper limit of tree establishment. To explore this variation, we analysed a global dataset of 166 sites for which treeline dynamics had been recorded since 1900 AD. Advance was recorded at 52% of sites with only 1% reporting treeline recession. Treelines that experienced strong winter warming were more likely to have advanced, and treelines with a diffuse form were more likely to have advanced than those with an abrupt or krummholz form. Diffuse treelines may be more responsive to warming because they are more strongly growth limited, whereas other treeline forms may be subject to additional constraints.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward mountains without permanent snow and ice
Huss, M., Bookhagen, B., Huggel, C., Jacobsen, D., Bradley, R. S., Clague, J. J., Vuille, M., Buytaert, W., Cayan, D. R., Greenwood, G., et al. (2017) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1002/2016ef000514 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Elevation alters ecosystem properties across temperate treelines globally
Mayor, J. R., Sanders, N. J., Classen, A. T., Bardgett, R. D., Clément, J.-C., Fajardo, A., Lavorel, S., Sundqvist, M. K., Bahn, M., Chisholm, C., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21027 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
- Authors
- Harsch, M. A., Hulme, P. E., McGlone, M. S., & Duncan, R. P.
- Affiliations
- Lincoln University (NZ)
- Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Harsch, Melanie A.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-09-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1040-1049
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2103818866
- Cited by
- 1,276
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 56
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecology Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- treeline advance, global warming, tree recruitment, winter warming, krummholz, growth limitation
- MeSH terms
- Climate, Geography, Population Density, Population Dynamics, Temperature, Trees, Databases, Factual, Greenhouse Effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review